首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Vertebral Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【2h】

General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Vertebral Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:通用麻醉与患者接受腰椎手术的患者的脊髓麻醉相比:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Vertebral lumbar surgery can be performed under both general anesthesia (GA) and spinal anesthesia. A clear benefit from spinal anesthesia (SA) remains unproven. The aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the early analgesic efficacy and recovery after SA and GA in adult patients undergoing vertebral lumbar surgery. A systematic investigation with the following criteria was performed: adult patients undergoing vertebral lumbar surgery (P); single-shot SA (I); GA care with or without wound infiltration (C); analgesic efficacy measured as postoperative pain, intraoperative hypotension, bradycardia, length of surgery, blood loss, postoperative side effects (such as postoperative nausea/vomiting and urinary retention), overall patient and surgeon satisfaction, and length of hospital stay (O); and randomized controlled trials (S). The search was performed in Pubmed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar up to 1 November 2020. Eleven studies were found upon this search. SA in vertebral lumbar surgery decreases postoperative pain and the analgesic requirement in the post anesthesia care unit. It is associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and a higher patient satisfaction. It has no effect on urinary retention, intraoperative bradycardia, or hypotension. SA should be considered as a viable and efficient anesthetic technique in vertebral lumbar surgery.
机译:椎骨腰椎手术可以在全身麻醉(GA)和脊髓麻醉下进行。脊髓麻醉(SA)的明显益处仍然是未经证实的。我们的荟萃分析的目的是比较椎骨腰椎手术的成人患者SA和GA后的早期镇痛效果和恢复。进行了下列标准的系统调查:成人患者接受椎骨腰椎手术(P);单次SA(i); GA CARE或没有伤口渗透(C);镇痛疗效作为术后疼痛,术中低血压,心动过缓,手术长度,血液丧失,术后副作用(如术后恶心/呕吐和尿潴留),整体患者和外科医生满意度,以及住院时间(O)的长度;和随机对照试验。搜索在PubMed,Cochrane中央登记册的PubMed中进行,谷歌学者在2020年11月1日上。在此搜索后发现了11项研究。在椎骨腰椎手术中的SA减少了术后疼痛和麻醉后护理单元的镇痛要求。它与术后恶心和呕吐的发病率降低,患者满意度较高。它对尿潴留,术中的心动过缓或低血压没有影响。 SA应该被认为是椎体腰椎手术中可行有效的麻醉技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号