首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Job Demand-Control-Support Latent Profiles and Their Relationships with Interpersonal Stressors Job Burnout and Intrinsic Work Motivation
【2h】

Job Demand-Control-Support Latent Profiles and Their Relationships with Interpersonal Stressors Job Burnout and Intrinsic Work Motivation

机译:工作需求控制 - 支持潜在概况及其与人际关系压力源职业倦怠和内在工作动机的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the Job Demand-Control-Support (JDCS) model, the combination of job demands, job control, and social support was hypothesized to lead to eight different constellations of job types. According to the model, these constellations are linked to wellbeing/health and learning outcomes. In the last three decades, these constellations of job types have been investigated by adopting a variable-centered perspective. However, latent profile analyses (LPA) enable a person-centered approach and empirically capture constellations of job types. In the present study, we used LPA to empirically identify distinct profiles of JDCS among Italian healthcare workers. Furthermore, we investigated the role of social stressors (workplace relationships and coworkers’ incivility) as antecedents of these profiles and the association of these profiles with job burnout and work motivation. Results from LPA (n = 1671) revealed four profiles: Isolated Prisoner, Participatory Leader, Moderate Strain, and Low Strain. Negative relationships at work and coworkers’ incivility increased the chances of being included in both Isolated prisoner and Participatory Leader profiles. Finally, the Isolated Prisoner and Moderate Strain profiles showed the highest levels of emotional exhaustion and cynicism and the lower levels of intrinsic work motivation. This study extends previous JDCS research, highlighting that researchers should consider empirically identified profiles rather than theoretically defined subgroups. Implications for stress theory, future research, and practice are discussed.
机译:在作业需求控制支持(JDCS)模型中,假设工作要求,作业控制和社会支持的组合,以导致八种不同的工作类型。根据该模型,这些星座与福利/健康和学习结果相关联。在过去的三十年中,通过采用以可变的视角来调查这些工作类型的作业星座。然而,潜在的简档分析(LPA)使得一种以人为本的方法和经验捕获作业类型的星座。在本研究中,我们使用LPA对意大利医疗工作者中的JDCS统一确定明显的曲线。此外,我们调查了社会压力源(工作场所关系和同事)作为这些简档的前提的作用以及这些概况与工作倦怠和工作动机的协会。 LPA的结果(n = 1671)揭示了四种曲线:孤立的囚犯,参与性领导者,中等应变和低菌株。工作和同事的效果在孤立的囚犯和参与式领导者概况中的可能性增加了否定的关系。最后,孤立的囚犯和中等应变曲线显示出最高水平的情绪疲惫和犬儒主义以及内在工作动机的较低水平。本研究扩展了以前的JDCS研究,突出了研究人员应考虑经验识别的概况而不是理论上定义的子组。讨论了对压力理论,未来研究和实践的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号