首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Do Protected Areas Matter? A Systematic Review of the Social and Ecological Impacts of the Establishment of Protected Areas
【2h】

Do Protected Areas Matter? A Systematic Review of the Social and Ecological Impacts of the Establishment of Protected Areas

机译:保护区域是否重要?对保护区建立的社会和生态影响的系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is growing interest in evaluating the effects of establishing protected areas (PAs). However, the mechanisms through which the establishment of PAs achieved significant positive effects remain unclear, and how different conservation mechanisms have achieved significant positive social and ecological benefits has also not been sufficiently studied. In this study, we systematically reviewed exemplary cases from Asia, Africa, and South America, using panel data to assess the conservation effectiveness of nature reserves and national parks. By surveying 629 literature samples reported in 31 studies, we found that the establishment of PAs has positive influences on poverty reduction, family incomes, household expenditure, employment, forest cover, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and a reduction in forest fragmentation. Furthermore, we analyzed the specific aspects that influence the publication of a paper in a high-impact journal. We found that publication is more likely when the research uses panel data, matching methods of data analysis, large samples, and plots or PAs as research units and has significant evaluation results. Our results suggest that future studies should use panel data and matching method analysis to assess the impacts of PAs from multiple perspectives and focus on the effectiveness of specific conservation mechanisms in achieving positive effects.
机译:对评估建立保护区(PAS)的影响,日益增长的兴趣。然而,建立PAS的机制取得了显着的积极影响,仍然不明确,以及不同的保护机制如何实现显着的积极社会和生态效益,也没有得到充分研究。在这项研究中,我们通过面板数据系统地审查了亚洲,非洲和南美的示例性案例,以评估自然保护区和国家公园的保护效果。通过测量31项研究报告的629个文献样本,我们发现PA的建立对减贫,家庭收入,家庭支出,就业,森林覆盖,生物多样性,碳封存以及森林碎片减少具有积极影响。此外,我们分析了影响纸张在高影响杂志中的出版物的具体方面。我们发现,当研究使用面板数据,数据分析,大型样品和情节或PAS作为研究单位的匹配方法以及具有显着的评估结果时,我们发现出版物更有可能。我们的研究结果表明,未来的研究应该使用面板数据和匹配方法分析来评估PAS从多重视角的影响,并注重特定保护机制在实现积极影响方面的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号