首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Seafarers’ Occupational Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk. Comments to Bolm-Audorff U.; et al. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
【2h】

Seafarers’ Occupational Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Risk. Comments to Bolm-Audorff U.; et al. Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机译:海员的职业噪音暴露和心血管风险。评论Bolm-AudorffU .;等等。职业噪声和高血压风险:系统审查和荟萃分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A German team published a new meta-analysis on the topic, “Occupational noise and hypertension risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis” in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [1]. They conclude to the relationship between a high level of blood pressure and noise exposure. One of the 23 selected articles was published in French in 1986 by Jégaden et al. It involved 455 seafarers aged from 40 to 55—164 mechanics and 291 deck crew members [2]. There is a relation between existence of lower auditiv capacity for the 4000 Hz frequency and exposure upper than 85 dB(A) [3]. The various impact of noise exposure level between these two categories of seafarers was only noticed among the mechanics’ strength. The prevalence of confirmed hypertension among mechanics was 18.90% (12.8–25%) compared to 11.68% (7.92–15.44%) in deck crew members (p < 0.05). The relative risk was 1.62 (1.03–2.53) and was independent to other risk factors of hypertension (obesity, alcohol consumption, hypertensive heredity). It also indicated that the occurrence of hypertension was related, on the one hand, to a high level of noise (>85 dB(A)) and, on the other hand, to a duration of exposure to noise for more than 20 years [2]. Similar to other publications, Bolm–Audorff meta-analysis provides clear evidence of the relationship between exposure to industrial noise above 85 dB(A) and the risk of high blood pressure [4,5,6,7]. This relative risk is calculated at 1.72 (1.48–2.01) [1]. Fu et al. find a relative risk of 1.62 (1.40–1.88) and Skogstad et al. 1.68 (1.10–2.57), similar to Jégaden et al. [2,4,5]. In a contradictory way, some studies continue to fail to find this relationship, including marine environment [8,9].
机译:德国队在国际环境研究和公共卫生期刊[1]中发表了关于该主题的新荟萃分析,“职业噪音和高血压风险:系统审查和荟萃分析”[1]。他们总结了高水平血压与噪音暴露之间的关系。 23所选择的文章之一由Jégaden等人于1986年在法国文章中公布。它涉及455岁以上40至55-164力学和291甲板船员的海员[2]。对于4000Hz频率和曝光超过85dB(a)[3],存在较低的auditiv容量之间的关系。这两类海员之间的噪声暴露水平的各种影响仅被注意到的力学强度。在甲板船员成员的11.68%(7.92-15.44%(7.92-15.44%)中,力学性高血压的患病率为18.90%(12.8-25%)(P <0.05)。相对风险为1.62(1.03-2.53),独立于高血压的其他危险因素(肥胖,酒精消费,高血压遗传)。它还表明,高血压的发生与一方面有相关的噪音(> 85dB(a)),另一方面,在暴露于噪声的持续时间超过20年[ 2]。与其他出版物类似,Bolm-Audorff Meta分析提供了明确的证据表明,暴露于85 dB(a)以上的工业噪声与高血压风险的关系[4,5,6,7]。这种相对风险在1.72(1.48-2.01)下计算[1]。 Fu等人。找到1.62(1.40-1.88)和Skogstad等人的相对风险。 1.68(1.10-2.57),类似于Jégaden等人。 [2,4,5]。以矛盾的方式,一些研究继续发现这种关系,包括海洋环境[8,9]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号