首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Innovation in Aging >NH Compare’s Health Deficiency 5-Star Rating: Do We Learn Different Things From Survey and Complaint Deficiencies?
【2h】

NH Compare’s Health Deficiency 5-Star Rating: Do We Learn Different Things From Survey and Complaint Deficiencies?

机译:NH比较的健康缺陷5星级评级:我们是否从调查和投诉缺陷中了解不同的东西?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes a 5-star rating system for nursing homes (NH). Currently, the 5-star rating for health deficiencies weights deficiencies from annual recertification surveys and complaints equally. Complaint deficiencies may contain different information than survey deficiencies because complaint deficiencies originate with consumers and complaint inspections are less predictable than surveys. The objective of this study is to construct separate 5-star ratings for survey and complaint deficiencies, and to compare them to CMS’ 5-star rating for health deficiencies. Using CASPER and ASPEN Complaints/Incident Tracking System for all NHs in 2017 (N=15,373), we calculated the 5-star rating for health deficiencies as reported by CMS, and then decompose CMS’ rating into separate 5-star ratings for survey and complaint deficiencies. The overall distributions of the CMS’ deficiency rating and survey deficiency rating are similar. The distribution of the complaint deficiency rating is different from CMS’ deficiency rating. Using complaint deficiencies, more NHs have 5-stars (26.5% vs. 10.5%) and fewer facilities have 4-stars (11.2% vs. 23.3%). Comparing the ratings for each facility relative to CMS’ rating, 35.3% of NHs have a different survey deficiency rating while 54.4% have a different complaint deficiency rating. A 5-star rating based on survey and complaint deficiencies results in different ratings for NHs, indicating that complaint deficiency ratings contain different information from survey deficiency ratings. CMS should publish separate ratings based on survey and complaint deficiencies to provide different information.
机译:Medicare和Medicaid服务中心(CMS)发布了5星级评级系统,用于护理家庭(NH)。目前,卫生缺陷的五星级评级权重缺乏年度重新认证调查和投诉。投诉缺陷可能包含不同的信息,而不是调查缺陷,因为投诉缺陷起源于消费者,并且投诉检查不如调查。本研究的目的是构建分离的5星级评级,以进行调查和投诉缺陷,并将其与CMS的5星级评级进行比较,以获得健康缺陷。在2017年使用CASPER和ASPEN投诉/事件跟踪系统(n = 15,373),我们计算了CMS报告的健康缺陷的五星级评级,然后将CMS评为分解为调查分离的5星级评级投诉缺陷。 CMS缺陷等级和调查缺陷等级的整体分布相似。投诉缺陷评级的分布与CMS缺陷等级不同。使用投诉缺陷,更多的NHS有5颗星(26.5%与10.5%)和更少的设施有4星(11.2%与23.3%)。将每个设施相对于CMS评级的评级进行比较,35.3%的NHS具有不同的测量缺乏评级,而54.4%具有不同的投诉缺陷等级。基于调查和投诉缺陷的五星级评级导致NHS的不同评级,表明投诉缺乏评分含有来自调查缺陷评级的不同信息。 CMS应根据调查和投诉缺陷发布单独的评级,以提供不同的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号