首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Children >Publication Trends of Pediatric and Adult Randomized Controlled Trials in General Medical Journals 2005–2018: A Citation Analysis
【2h】

Publication Trends of Pediatric and Adult Randomized Controlled Trials in General Medical Journals 2005–2018: A Citation Analysis

机译:2005 - 2018年期刊上的儿科和成人随机对照试验的出版趋势2005 - 2018年:引文分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Policy has been developed to promote the conduct of high-quality pediatric randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Whether these strategies have influenced publication trends in high-impact journals is unknown. We aim to evaluate characteristics, citation patterns, and publication trends of pediatric RCTs published in general medical journals (GMJs) compared with adult RCTs over a 13-year period. Studies were identified using Medline, and impact metrics were collected from Web of Science and Scopus. All RCTs published from 2005–2018 in 7 GMJs with the highest impact factors were identified for analysis. A random sample of matched pediatric and adult RCTs were assessed for publication characteristics, academic and non-academic citation. Citations were counted from publication until June 2019. Among 4146 RCTs, 2794 (67.3%) enrolled adults, 591 (14.2%) enrolled children, and 761 RCTs (18.3%) enrolled adult and pediatric patients. Adult RCTs published in GMJs grew by 5.1 publications per year (95% CI: 3.3–6.9), while the number of pediatric RCTs did not show significant change (−0.4 RCTs/year, 95% CI: −1.4–0.6). Adult RCTs were cited more than pediatric RCTs (median(IQR): 29.9 (68.5–462.8) citations/year vs. 13.2 (6.8–24.9) citations/year; p < 0.001); however, social media attention was similar (median(IQR) Altmetric Attention Score: 37 (13.75–133.8) vs. 26 (6.2–107.5); p = 0.25). Despite policies which may facilitate conduct of pediatric RCTs, the publishing gap in high-impact GMJs is widening.
机译:制定了政策,促进了高质量的儿科随机对照试验(RCT)的行为。这些策略是否影响了高影响期刊的出版趋势是未知的。与13年内的成人RCT相比,我们旨在评估一般医学期刊(GMJS)发表的特征,引文模式和出版趋势。使用Medline鉴定研究,并从科学和Scopus网络中收集了影响指标。所有RCT在7 Gmjs中发布的所有RCT,都确定了最高影响因子的分析。评估出版特征,学术和非学术引用的匹配小儿科和成人RCT的随机样品。引文从出版物计算到2019年6月。在4146年的RCT中,2794名(67.3%)注册成人,591名(14.2%)招募儿童,761名RCT(18.3%)注册成人和儿科患者。 GMJS发布的成人RCT每年增长5.1出版物(95%CI:3.3-6.9),而儿科RCT的数量没有显示出显着变化(-0.4 rcts /年,95%CI:-1.4-0.6)。成年RCT被引入儿科RCT(中位数(IQR):29.9(68.5-462.8)条文/年与13.2(6.8-24.9)引用/年; P <0.001);然而,社交媒体的关注是相似的(中位数(IQR)矿产注意力得分:37(13.75-133.8)与26(6.2-107.5); p = 0.25)。尽管政策可以促进儿科RCT的行为,但高影响GMJS的出版差距正在扩大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号