首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancers >The Effect of Resection Margin on Local Recurrence and Survival in High Grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities: How Far Is Far Enough?
【2h】

The Effect of Resection Margin on Local Recurrence and Survival in High Grade Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities: How Far Is Far Enough?

机译:切除边缘对局部高级软组织肉瘤局部复发和存活的影响:足够远?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In soft tissue sarcomas the width of surgical margins after resection determines the extent of surgery and the function after resection. But how far is really necessary? 305 patients with deep-seated, G2/3 soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity, the trunk wall, or the pelvis were reviewed. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 82%. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 66%. Positive (contaminated) margins worsened LRFS and OS. A margin of >10 mm did not improve LRFS and OS as compared to one of >5 mm. A resection margin of <1 mm showed a trend but not significantly better LRFS or OS compared to a contaminated margin. In conclusion the margin should at least be free of tumor, in sound tissue. A margin of >5 mm sound tissue seems to be sufficient. Resecting more tissue does not benefit the patient.
机译:在软组织中,切除后手术边缘的宽度决定了切除后手术的程度和功能。但真的有必要? 305患者患有深层,末端的G2 / 3软组织肉瘤,树干壁或骨盆的患者进行了综述。 5年的局部复发存活(LRFS)为82%。 5年的整体存活率(OS)为66%。阳性(污染)利润率恶化了LRFS和OS。与> 5毫米之一相比,余量> 10 mm没有改善LRF和OS。与受污染的边距相比,<1 mm的切除缘显示出趋势,但没有明显更好的LRF或OS。总之,边缘应至少在声音组织中没有肿瘤。裕度> 5毫米声音组织似乎足够了。切除更多组织并不能让患者受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号