首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Open Heart >Healthcare provider-led interventions to support medication adherence following ACS: a meta-analysis
【2h】

Healthcare provider-led interventions to support medication adherence following ACS: a meta-analysis

机译:由医疗保健提供者主导的干预措施以支持ACS后的药物依从性:一项荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of healthcare provider-led (HCPs) interventions to support medication adherence in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A systematic search of Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, IPA, CINAHL, ASSIA, OpenGrey, EthOS, WorldCat and PQDT was undertaken. Interventions were deemed eligible if they included adult ACS patients, were HCP-led, measured medication adherence and randomised participants to parallel groups. Intervention content was coded using the Behaviour Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy and data were pooled for analysis using random-effects models. Our search identified 8870 records, of which 27 were eligible (23 primary studies). A meta-analysis (n=9735) revealed HCP-led interventions increased the odds of medication adherence by 54% compared to control interventions (k=23, OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.88, I2=57.5%). After removing outliers, there was a 41% increase in the odds of medication adherence with moderate heterogeneity (k=21, OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.65, I2=35.3%). Interventions that included phone contact yielded (k=12, OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.12, I2=32.0%) a larger effect compared to those delivered exclusively in person. A total of 32/93 BCTs were identified across interventions (mean=4.7, SD=2.2) with ‘information about health consequences’ (BCT 5.1) (19/23) the most common. HCP-led interventions for ACS patients appear to have a small positive impact on medication adherence. While we were able to identify BCTs among interventions, data were insufficient to determine the impact of particular BCTs on study effectiveness.PROSPERO registration number CRD42016037706.
机译:我们进行了系统的审查和荟萃分析,以确定由医疗保健提供者主导(HCP)的干预措施在支持急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者依从性方面的有效性。对Cochrane图书馆,Medline,EMBASE,PsycINFO,Web of Science,IPA,CINAHL,ASSIA,OpenGrey,EthOS,WorldCat和PQDT进行了系统搜索。如果干预措施包括成年ACS患者,HCP主导,测量的药物依从性并且将参与者随机分为平行组,则认为干预是合格的。使用行为改变技术(BCT)分类法对干预内容进行编码,并使用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总分析。我们的搜索确定了8870条记录,其中27条符合条件(23项主要研究)。一项荟萃分析(n = 9735)显示,与对照干预相比,HCP主导的干预使药物依从性的几率提高了54%(k = 23,或1.54,95%CI为1.26至1.88,I 2 = 57.5%)。除去异常值后,具有中等异质性的药物依从性几率增加了41%(k = 21,或1.41,95%CI为1.21至1.65,I 2 = 35.3%)。与仅亲自进行的干预相比,包括电话联系在内的干预产生的效果更大(k = 12,或1.63,95%CI 1.25至2.12,I 2 = 32.0%)。在所有干预措施中,总共确定了32/93个BCT(平均值= 4.7,SD = 2.2),其中最常见的是“有关健康后果的信息”(BCT 5.1)(19/23)。由HCP引导的ACS患者干预措施似乎对药物依从性影响较小。尽管我们能够确定干预措施中的BCT,但数据不足以确定特定BCT对研究有效性的影响.PROSPERO注册号CRD42016037706。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号