首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Geriatrics Journal >Family Presence in Long-Term Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Call to Action for Policy Practice and Research
【2h】

Family Presence in Long-Term Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Call to Action for Policy Practice and Research

机译:在Covid-19大流行期间长期护理家庭存在:呼吁政策实践和研究行动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

On March 11, 2020 the World Health Organization recognized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a global pandemic.(1) By March 27, 2020 public health states of emergency had been declared in all of Canada’s provinces and territories as a means of containing the rapid and exponential spread of COVID-19. This gave governments the authority to close schools, restrict business operations, and limit the size of public gatherings. Visitation restrictions in health-care settings were enacted, with all non-essential visitors prohibited from entering facilities. Congregate living residential homes for older adults, such as long-term care (LTC) and personal care homes, were included in these restrictions in order to reduce potential for risk of transmission between residents, staff, and visitors. Initially, visitation policies were highly restrictive, classifying spouses/partners and adult children of residents in the same category as entertainers, except for “compassionate care” reasons that were poorly defined and inconsistently applied. Over the ensuing months, policies became more flexible and allowed case-by-case assessment of visits deemed essential. Provincial policies continue to differ and lack detail regarding who would be responsible to classify a visitor as essential and what criteria would be used to make these judgments.(2)
机译:2020年3月11日,世界卫生组织公认的2019年冠状病毒疾病(Covid-19)作为全球大流行。(1)到3月27日,加拿大各省和领土的所有公共卫生国家的公共卫生国家宣布为一个手段包含Covid-19的快速和指数扩散。这使各国政府能够关闭学校,限制业务运营,并限制公共集会的规模。颁布了卫生保健环境的探访限制,所有非必要访客都禁止进入设施。在这些限制中,包括长期护理(LTC)和个人护理室等老年人的生活住宅,以减少居民,工作人员和访客的传播风险的潜力。最初,探视政策是高度限制性的,分类配偶/合作伙伴和成年儿童在与艺术家相同的类别中的居民,除了“富有同情心的关怀”的原因,这些原因是差异差不多的原因和不一致地应用。在随后的几个月内,政策变得更加灵活,允许逐个案例评估视达必不可少的访问。省政政策仍然有所不同,缺乏关于将访客分类至关重要的谁,并将用于制定这些判断的标准。(2)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号