首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Canadian Journal of Surgery >Is an optical illusion the cause of classical bile duct injuries?
【2h】

Is an optical illusion the cause of classical bile duct injuries?

机译:是一种透镜态胆管损伤的幻觉吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We sought to determine if lateral–inferior traction on the Hartmann pouch could produce bile duct kinking and subsequent misinterpretation of the space on the left side of the bile duct as the hepatobiliary triangle. Once traction was applied, we measured the angle between the cystic duct and inferior gallbladder wall (hepatobiliary triangle) in 76 cases, and the angle between the common bile duct and common hepatic duct (porta hepatis “triangle”) in 41 cases. The mean angles were significantly different (hepatobiliary triangle mean 68.2°, standard deviation [SD] 16.0°, range 23–109°; porta hepatis “triangle” mean 112.0°, SD 18.4°, range 72–170°; p < 0.01). The ranges, however, overlapped in 26 cases. In many cases, lateral–inferior traction on the Hartmann pouch produced substantial kinking of the bile duct that could easily elicit the illusion that it is the hepatobiliary triangle rather than the centre of the porta hepatis.
机译:我们试图确定Hartmann Pouch上的横向劣质牵引是否可以产生胆管扭结,随后将胆管左侧的空间误解为肝胆三角形。一旦施用牵引力,我们在76例中测量了囊性管道和较差的胆囊壁(肝胆三角)之间的角度,并且在41例中,普通胆管和常见的肝管(Porta Hepatis“三角形)之间的角度。平均角度显着不同(肝胆三角平均值68.2°,标准偏差16.0°,范围为23-109°; Porta Hepatis“三角形”平均值112.0°,SD 18.4°,范围72-170°; P <0.01) 。然而,范围在26例中重叠。在许多情况下,Hartmann袋上的侧外牵引力产生了胆管的大量扭结,可以很容易地引起肝胆道三角形而不是波特肝的中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号