首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open >Clinicians’ heuristic assessments of radiographs compared with Kellgren-Lawrence and Ahlbäck ordinal grading: an exploratory study of knee radiographs using paired comparisons
【2h】

Clinicians’ heuristic assessments of radiographs compared with Kellgren-Lawrence and Ahlbäck ordinal grading: an exploratory study of knee radiographs using paired comparisons

机译:临床医生对Xcextropls的启发式评估与Kellgren-Lawrence和Ahlbäck序数分级:使用配对比较的膝关节射线照片的探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ordinal scales provide means for communicating the severity of a condition, but they are affected by cognitive biases, they introduce statistical problems and they sacrifice resolution. Clinicians discern more details than contained in scales, for example, when assessing radiographs, but clinicians’ distinctions are often based on experience-based rules of thumb, that is, heuristics. The objectives of this study are to compare clinicians’ heuristic assessments to ordinal grading, to identify case elements that influence clinicians’ judgements and to present a method for quantifying heuristic assessments.
机译:序数尺度提供了通信条件严重程度的手段,但它们受到认知偏见的影响,它们引入统计问题并牺牲了解决方案。临床医生辨别比秤所含的细节更多,例如,在评估射线照相时,但临床医生的区别通常是基于基于经验的拇指规则,即启发式。本研究的目标是将临床医生的启发式评估进行比较,以确定影响临床医生判决的案例要素,并提出了一种定量启发式评估的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号