首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMJ Open Diabetes Research Care >Lifestyle interventions for type 2 diabetes management among migrants and ethnic minorities living in industrialized countries: a systematic review and meta-analyses
【2h】

Lifestyle interventions for type 2 diabetes management among migrants and ethnic minorities living in industrialized countries: a systematic review and meta-analyses

机译:在工业化国家的移民和少数群体中的2型糖尿病管理的生活方式干预:系统审查和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions to improve the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among migrants and ethnic minorities. Major searched databases included MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via Ovid) and CINAHL. The selection of studies and data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In the meta-analysis, significant heterogeneity was detected among the studies (I2 >50%), and hence a random effects model was used. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the effect of lifestyle interventions according to intervention approaches (peer-led vs community health workers (CHWs)-led). A total of 17 studies were included in this review which used interventions delivered by CHWs or peer supporters or combination of both. The majority of the studies assessed effectiveness of key primary (hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipids, fasting plasma glucose) and secondary outcomes (weight, body mass index, blood pressure, physical activity, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, food habits and healthcare utilization). Meta-analyses showed lifestyle interventions were associated with a small but statistically significant reduction in HbA1c level (−0.18%; 95% CI −0.32% to −0.04%, p=0.031). In subgroup analyses, the peer-led interventions showed relatively better HbA1c improvement than CHW-led interventions, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.379). Seven studies presented intervention costs, which ranged from US$131 to US$461 per participant per year. We conclude that lifestyle interventions using either CHWs or peer supporters or a combination of both have shown modest effectiveness for T2DM management among migrants of different background and origin and ethnic minorities. The evidence base is promising in terms of developing culturally appropriate, clinically sound and cost-effective intervention approaches to respond to the growing and diverse migrants and ethnic minorities affected by diabetes worldwide.
机译:该系统审查的目的是确定生活方式干预的有效性,以改善移民和少数群体中2型糖尿病(T2DM)的管理。主要搜索数据库包括Medline(通过Pubmed),Embase(通过Ovid)和Cinahl。选择和数据提取的选择遵循了系统评价和Meta-Analys指南的首选报告项目。在荟萃分析中,在研究中检测到显着的异质性(I2> 50%),因此使用随机效应模型。进行亚组分析以比较根据干预方法的生活方式干预的效果(同行LED与社区卫生工作者(CHW)-LED)。本综述中共有17项研究,其中使用CHW或对等支持者或两者组合提供的干预措施。大多数研究评估了关键原发性的有效性(血红蛋白(HBA1C),脂质,空腹血浆葡萄糖)和二次结果(体重,体重指数,血压,身体活动,饮酒,烟草吸烟,食品习惯和医疗利用) 。 Meta-Analyzes显示了生活方式干预与HBA1C水平的小但统计学显着降低有关(-0.18%; 95%CI -0.32%至-0.04%,P = 0.031)。在亚组分析中,对等LED干预率比CHW-LED干预率显示出相对更好的HBA1C改善,但差异在统计学上没有统计学意义(P = 0.379)。七项研究表现出干预成本,范围从每年的每位参与者每年131美元至1361美元。我们得出结论,使用CHWS或同行支持者的生活方式干预或两者的组合对不同背景和起源和少数民族的移民进行了适度的T2DM管理的效率。证据基础是在制定文化适当的,临床声音和经济效益的干预方法方面的承诺,以应对全世界糖尿病影响的越来越多的移民和少数群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号