首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Capacity Sharing and Capacity Investment of Environment-Friendly Manufacturing: Strategy Selection and Performance Analysis
【2h】

Capacity Sharing and Capacity Investment of Environment-Friendly Manufacturing: Strategy Selection and Performance Analysis

机译:环境友好制造能力共享和能力投资:战略选择和绩效分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many small manufacturing factories suffer insufficient environment-friendly capacity after eliminating the outdated and environmental-harmful production capacity according to stringent environmental rules and regulations. This paper analyzes two strategies that the manufacturer with limited environment-friendly capacity may take to tackle this problem, i.e., investing in building environment-friendly capacities and collaborating with the manufacturer with sufficient environment-friendly capacity in capacity sharing. In a supply chain with two competing manufacturers, this paper builds game-theoretical models and investigates equilibrium solutions under three scenarios (no capacity investment or sharing, capacity investment, and capacity sharing). Then this research investigates the feasible regions of these two strategies and compares the performance of each manufacturer under each scenario. The findings show that both capacity investment and capacity sharing can effectively reduce the profit loss of the manufacturer with limited capacity, while only capacity sharing benefits both manufacturers. The feasibility of these two strategies depends on the initial capacity volume and the capacity investment cost coefficient of the manufacturer with limited capacity. Moreover, the preference of the manufacturer with limited capacity for each strategy depends on the capacity investment cost coefficient. When the capacity investment cost coefficient is relatively high, the win-win situation exists for supply chain members. Furthermore, with the use of chaos theory, the paper shows how to adjust the capacity investment in each period to keep the system stable.
机译:根据严格的环境规则和法规消除过时和环境有害的生产能力,许多小型制造工厂的环境友好能力不足。本文分析了制造商具有有限的环境友好能力的两种策略,可能需要解决这个问题,即投资建设环境友好能力并与制造商合作,具有足够的环境友好能力。在具有两个竞争制造商的供应链中,本文建立了游戏理论模型,并在三种情况下调查均衡解决方案(没有能力投资或分享,容量投资和产能共享)。然后,这项研究调查了这两种策略的可行区域,并在每种情况下比较了每个制造商的性能。调查结果表明,所有能力投资和产能分担都可以有效降低制造商的利润损失,其容量有限,而只有产能共享效益均有厂商。这两种策略的可行性取决于初始容量体积和制造商的能力投资成本系数,容量有限。此外,制造商对每个策略容量有限的优选取决于容量投资成本系数。当能力投资成本系数相对较高时,供应链成员的双赢情况存在。此外,随着混沌理论的使用,本文展示了如何调整每个时期的容量投资,以保持系统稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号