首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Reliability Factor Structure and Predictive Validity of the Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Scales of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Criteria of Fibromyalgia
【2h】

Reliability Factor Structure and Predictive Validity of the Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Scales of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology Criteria of Fibromyalgia

机译:2010年美国风湿病学型纤维术标准的广泛疼痛指数及症状严重程度的可靠性因子结构及预测有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic condition of widespread pain. In 2010, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) proposed new diagnostic criteria for FMS based on two scales: the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptoms Severity (SS) scale. This study evaluated the reliability, factor structure and predictive validity of WPI and SS. In total, 102 women with FMS and 68 women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) completed the WPI, SS, McGill Pain Questionnaire, Trait Anxiety Inventory, Fatigue Severity Scale, Oviedo Quality of Sleep Questionnaire, and Beck Depression Inventory. Pain threshold and tolerance and a measure of central sensitization to pain were obtained by pressure algometry. Values on WPI and SS showed negative-skewed frequency distributions in FMS patients, with most of the observations concentrated at the upper end of the scale. Factor analysis did not reveal single-factor models for either scale; instead, the WPI was composed of nine pain-localization factors and the SS of four factors. The Cronbach’s α (i.e., Internal consistency) was 0.34 for the WPI,0.83 for the SS and 0.82 for the combination of WPI and SS. Scores on both scales correlated positively with measures of clinical pain, fatigue, insomnia, depression, and anxiety but were unrelated to pain threshold and tolerance or central pain sensitization. The 2010 ACR criteria showed 100% sensitivity and 81% specificity in the discrimination between FMS and RA patients, where discrimination was better for WPI than SS. In conclusion, despite their limited reliability, both scales allow for highly accurate identification and differentiation of FMS patients. The inclusion of more painful areas in the WPI and of additional symptoms in the SS may reduce ceiling effects and improve the discrimination between patients differing in disease severity. In addition, the use of higher cut-off values on both scales may increase the diagnostic specificity in Spanish samples.
机译:纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)是一种慢性疼痛的慢性条件。 2010年,美国风湿病学院(ACR)提出了基于两种尺度的FMS的新诊断标准:广泛的疼痛指数(WPI)和症状严重程度(SS)规模。本研究评估了WPI和SS的可靠性,因子结构和预测有效性。总共有102名妇女患有FMS和68名患有类风湿性关节炎的女性(RA)完成了WPI,SS,McGill疼痛问卷调查问卷,特质焦虑库存,疲劳严重程度,睡眠问卷的oviedo品质,以及贝克抑郁症库存。通过压力避难所测量获得疼痛阈值和耐受性和对疼痛的中心致敏的衡量标准。 WPI和SS的值显示为FMS患者的负偏置频率分布,大部分观察结果集中在尺度的上端。因子分析没有透露任何一个规模的单因素模型;相反,WPI由九个疼痛定位因子和四个因素组成。 WPI的Cronbach的α(即,内部一致性)为0.34,SS为0.83和WPI和SS组合的0.82。两种鳞片上的分数正相关,临床疼痛,疲劳,失眠,抑郁和焦虑措施,但与疼痛阈值和耐受性或中央疼痛敏化无关。 2010年ACR标准在FMS和RA患者之间的歧视中显示了100%的灵敏度和81%的特异性,其中歧视比SS更好。总之,尽管其可靠性有限,但两种尺度都允许对FMS患者的高度准确鉴定和分化。在WPI中包含更痛苦的区域和SS中的其他症状可能会降低天花板效应,并改善疾病严重程度不同的患者之间的歧视。此外,在两个尺度上使用更高的截止值可能会增加西班牙样本中的诊断特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号