首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up
【2h】

Hybrid Polyetheretherketone (PEEK)–Acrylic Resin Prostheses and the All-on-4 Concept: A Full-Arch Implant-Supported Fixed Solution with 3 Years of Follow-Up

机译:杂交聚醚醚酮(PEEK) - 丙烯酸树脂假体和全持有4个概念:全拱形植入式固定解决方案具有3年的后续行动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The aim of this three-year prospective study was to examine the outcome of a solution for full-arch rehabilitation through a fixed implant-supported hybrid prosthesis (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)-acrylic resin) used in conjunction with the All-on-4 concept. Methods: Thirty-seven patients (29 females, 8 males), with an age range of 38 to 78 years (average: 59.8 years) were rehabilitated with 49 full-arch implant-supported prostheses (12 maxillary rehabilitations, 13 mandibular rehabilitations and 12 bimaxillary rehabilitations). The primary outcome measure was prosthetic survival. Secondary outcome measures were marginal bone loss, plaque and bleeding scores, veneer adhesion issues, biological complications, mechanical complications, and the patients’ subjective evaluation. Results: There were two patients (maxillary rehabilitations) lost to follow-up, while one patient withdrew (maxillary rehabilitation). One patient with bimaxillary rehabilitation fractured the mandibular PEEK framework, rendering a 98% prosthetic survival rate. Implant survival was 100%. Average (standard deviation) marginal bone loss at 3-years was 0.40 mm (0.73 mm). Veneer adhesion was the only technical complication ( = 8 patients), resolved for all patients. Nine patients ( = 11 prostheses) experienced mechanical complications (all resolved): fracture of acrylic resin crowns ( = 3 patients), prosthetic and abutment screw loosening ( = 4 patients and 3 patients, respectively), abutment wearing ( = 1 patient). One patient experienced a biological complication (peri-implant pathology), resolved through non-surgical therapy. A 90% satisfaction rate was registered for the patients’ subjective evaluation. Conclusions: Based on the results, the three-year outcome suggests the proposed rehabilitation solution as a legitimate treatment option, providing a potential shock-absorbing alternative that could benefit the implant biological outcome.
机译:背景:这项三年前瞻性研究的目的是通过固定的植入物支持的杂化假体(聚醚醚酮(PEEK) - 丙烯酸树脂)与全展 - 4个概念。方法:三十七名患者(29例女性,8名男性),恢复了38至78岁(平均:59.8岁),49个全拱植入支持的假体(12个上颌康复,13名下颌康复和12名Bimaxillary康复)。主要结果措施是假体存活。次要结果措施是边缘骨质损失,斑块和出血分数,单板粘附问题,生物并发症,机械并发症和患者的主观评价。结果:有两名患者(上颌康复)失去随访,而一名患者退出过(上颌康复)。一名患有骨髓康复的患者破坏下颌PEEK框架,呈现98%的假肢存活率。植入物存活是100%。平均(标准偏差)3年间边缘骨质损失为0.40毫米(0.73毫米)。胶合剂粘附是唯一的技术并发症(= 8名患者),解决了所有患者。九名患者(= 11个假体)经历了机械并发症(全部解决):丙烯酸树脂冠部的骨折(= 3例),假肢和邻接螺杆松动(= 4例和3名患者,分别),基台佩戴(= 1例)。一名患者经历了生物并发症(PERI植入病理学),通过非手术治疗解决。为患者的主观评估注册了90%的满意度。结论:根据结果,为期三年的结果表明,拟议的康复解决方案作为合法治疗选择,提供了可能使植入物生物结果有益的潜在减震替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号