首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nanomaterials >The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces
【2h】

The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Sequences on The Surface Roughness of Three Different Nanocomposites and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces

机译:精加工和抛光序列对三种不同纳米复合材料的表面粗糙度和复合材料/牙釉质和复合材料界面的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of final surface treatment and dental composite type on the roughness of the composite surface, composite/enamel interface, and composite/cementum interface, as well as on the polishing time. Class V cavities prepared in extracted teeth ( = 126) were restored using one of the three nanohybrid composites with different filler sizes. The specimens were randomly assigned to three different finishing and polishing sequences. The roughness (Ra) of the investigated surfaces was measured using the contact profilometer. The time required to achieve visible gloss was documented. The data were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test ( < 0.05). There was no significant influence of the composite type on the restoration surface roughness ( = 0.088), while the polishing method had a significant impact ( < 0.001). The Ra of the composites ranged between 0.08 µm and 0.29 µm, with the lowest values (0.09 µm ± 0.05 µm) found in the aluminum oxide disc group ( < 0.001). The time to achieve a visible composite gloss was influenced by the polishing method, composite type, and interactions between these factors ( < 0.001). The interface roughness was significantly greater than that of the composite surface ( < 0.001), and depended on the composite type and polishing system employed.
机译:本研究的目的是探讨最终表面处理和牙科复合材料对复合表面,复合材料/搪瓷界面和复合/水泥界面的粗糙度以及抛光时间的影响。使用具有不同填料尺寸的三种纳米含量复合材料中的一种恢复在提取的牙齿(= 126)中制备的V类V空腔。将样本随机分配到三种不同的精加工和抛光序列。使用接触式轮廓仪测量研究表面的粗糙度(RA)。记录了实现可见光光泽所需的时间。使用具有Tukey的后HOC测试的ANOVA分析数据(<0.05)。复合型对恢复表面粗糙度没有显着影响(= 0.088),而抛光方法产生显着影响(<0.001)。复合材料的RA在0.08μm和0.29μm之间,在氧化铝盘组中发现的最低值(0.09μm±0.05μm)(<0.001)。实现可见复合光泽度的时间受到抛光方法,复合型和这些因素之间的相互作用的影响(<0.001)。界面粗糙度明显大于复合表面(<0.001)的粗糙度,并取决于所用的复合式和抛光系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号