首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pain Research and Treatment >Pain and Efficacy Rating of a Microprocessor-Controlled Metered Injection System for Local Anaesthesia in Minor Hand Surgery
【2h】

Pain and Efficacy Rating of a Microprocessor-Controlled Metered Injection System for Local Anaesthesia in Minor Hand Surgery

机译:小型手外科手术中局部麻醉的微处理器控制的定量注射系统的疼痛和功效等级

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. Little attention has been given to syringe design and local anaesthetic administration methods. A microprocessor-controlled anaesthetic delivery device has become available that may minimize discomfort during injection. The purpose of this study was to document the pain experience associated with the use of this system and to compare it with use of a conventional syringe. Methods. A prospective, randomized clinical trial was designed. 40 patients undergoing carpal tunnel release were block randomized according to sex into a two groups: a traditional syringe group and a microprocessor-controlled device group. The primary outcome measure was surgical pain and local anaesthetic administration pain. Secondary outcomes included volume of anaesthetic used and injection time. Results. Analysis showed that equivalent anaesthesia was achieved in the microprocessor-controlled group despite using a significantly lower volume of local anaesthetic (P = .0002). This same group, however, has significantly longer injection times (P < .0001). Pain during the injection process or during surgery was not different between the two groups. Conclusions. This RCT comparing traditional and microprocessor controlled methods of administering local anaesthetic showed similar levels of discomfort in both groups. While the microprocessor-controlled group used less volume, the total time for the administration was significantly greater.
机译:目的。注射器设计和局部麻醉剂的施用方法很少受到关注。可以使用微处理器控制的麻醉剂输送装置,该装置可以最大程度地减少注射过程中的不适感。本研究的目的是记录与使用该系统相关的疼痛经历,并将其与常规注射器进行比较。方法。设计了一项前瞻性随机临床试验。将40例行腕管松解术的患者按性别分为两组:传统注射器组和微处理器控制的设备组。主要结果指标是手术疼痛和局部麻醉药施用疼痛。次要结果包括麻醉剂使用量和注射时间。结果。分析表明,尽管使用了较低的局麻药量,但在微处理器控制组中仍可实现等效麻醉(P = .0002)。但是,同一组的注射时间明显更长(P <.0001)。两组在注射过程中或手术期间的疼痛无差异。结论。该RCT比较了传统和微处理器控制的局部麻醉方法,显示两组的不适程度相似。尽管微处理器控制的组使用的体积较小,但总的管理时间却明显更长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号