首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI >The Impact of Common Recovery Blood Sampling Methods in Mice (Mus Musculus) on Well-Being and Sample Quality: A Systematic Review
【2h】

The Impact of Common Recovery Blood Sampling Methods in Mice (Mus Musculus) on Well-Being and Sample Quality: A Systematic Review

机译:小鼠(小家鼠)常见采血方法对健康和样品质量的影响:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Blood sampling is often performed in laboratory mice. Whilst the techniques are likely to cause only momentary pain or distress, given their frequency of performance, it is essential that the method which best safeguards welfare is used. The small size of mice makes sampling challenging, and use of some routes is controversial due to perceived impact on animal welfare. However, to date, no summary of the evidence relating to welfare impacts arising from these techniques has been presented. This paper presents a systematic review of the literature, with quality appraisal of the studies and an assignment of certainty in the evidence. We conclude that there is not enough high-quality evidence available to make a determination on optimal blood sampling route. We provide recommendations for improving future laboratory animal welfare research through standardisation of outcome measures and enhanced adherence to experimental design and reporting guidelines.
机译:血液采样通常在实验室小鼠中进行。尽管这些技术可能仅会造成短暂的疼痛或困扰,但鉴于它们的执行频率,使用最能保障福利的方法至关重要。小鼠的体积小,使采样更具挑战性,并且由于对动物福利的感知影响,某些途径的使用存在争议。但是,迄今为止,尚未提供与这些技术所产生的福利影响有关的证据的摘要。本文对文献进行了系统的综述,并对研究进行了质量评估并确定了证据的确定性。我们得出的结论是,没有足够的高质量证据来确定最佳的血液采样途径。我们提供建议,以通过标准化成果指标并加强对实验设计和报告指南的遵守来改善未来的实验室动物福利研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号