首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Academic Forensic Pathology >Rules for Establishing Causation in Opiate/Opioid OverdoseProsecutions — The Burrage Decision
【2h】

Rules for Establishing Causation in Opiate/Opioid OverdoseProsecutions — The Burrage Decision

机译:建立阿片类药物/阿片类药物过量因果关系的规则起诉-突发事件决定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As the opiate/opioid crisis has worsened in the United States, one of the law enforcement responses has involved increased efforts to prosecute the individuals responsible for the distribution of illicit drugs that result in overdoses. When mixed intoxications occur, the controlling decision for prosecution is Burrage v. United States (2014), which provides guidance on the types of evidence required for establishment of causation. In many types of legal proceedings, forensic pathologists are called to provide expert testimony, although they may be unaware of the burden of proof that is required in a given case. This paper seeks to elaborate upon the burden of proof in drug overdose prosecutions with the guidance of Burrage and offer insight into the expectations and limitations involved in these cases.
机译:随着美国的阿片类药物/阿片类药物危机恶化,执法措施之一是加大力度起诉负责分配导致过量用药的非法药物的个人。当发生混合性醉酒时,起诉的决定权是Burrage诉美国(2014年),该决定为确定因果关系所需的证据类型提供了指导。在许多类型的法律诉讼中,法医病理学家均被要求提供专家作证,尽管他们可能不了解特定案件所需的举证责任。本文试图在Burrage的指导下详细阐述药物过量起诉中的举证责任,并深入了解这些案件所涉及的期望和局限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号