首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Assessing Women’s Menstruation Concerns and Experiences in Rural India: Development and Validation of a Menstrual Insecurity Measure
【2h】

Assessing Women’s Menstruation Concerns and Experiences in Rural India: Development and Validation of a Menstrual Insecurity Measure

机译:评估印度农村妇女的月经问题和经验:月经不安全措施的发展和验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Qualitative research has documented menstruator’s challenges, particularly in water and sanitation poor environments, but quantitative assessment is limited. We created and validated a culturally-grounded measure of Menstrual Insecurity to assess women’s menstruation-related concerns and negative experiences. With cross-sectional data from 878 menstruating women in rural Odisha, India, we carried out Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory (CFA) Factor Analyses to reduce a 40-item pool and identify and confirm the scale factor structure. A 19-item, five factor model best fit the data (EFA: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.027; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.994; Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.989; CFA: RMSEA = 0.058; CFI = 0.937; TLI = 0.925). Sub-scales included: Management, Menstrual Cycle Concerns, Symptoms, Restrictions, and Menstruation-Related Bodily Concerns. Those without access to a functional latrine, enclosed bathing space, water source within their compound, or who used reusable cloth had significantly higher overall Menstrual Insecurity scores (greater insecurity) than those with these facilities or using disposable pads. Post-hoc exploratory analysis found that women reporting experiencing tension at menstrual onset or difficulty doing work had significantly higher Menstrual Insecurity scores. This validated tool is useful for measuring Menstrual Insecurity, assessing health inequities and correlates of Menstrual Insecurity, and informing program design.
机译:定性研究记录了月经者的挑战,特别是在水和卫生条件恶劣的环境中,但定量评估是有限的。我们创建并验证了一种基于文化的月经不安全性评估方法,以评估妇女与月经有关的问题和不良经历。利用来自印度奥里萨邦农村的878名经期妇女的横断面数据,我们进行了探索性(EFA)和验证性(CFA)因子分析,以减少40个项目的集合,并确定和确认比例因子结构。 19个项目的五因素模型最适合数据(EFA:近似均方根误差(RMSEA)= 0.027;比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.994; Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)= 0.989; CFA:RMSEA = 0.058; CFI = 0.937; TLI = 0.925)。子量表包括:管理,月经周期问题,症状,限制因素以及与月经有关的身体问题。与那些使用这些设施或使用一次性尿垫的人相比,那些无法使用功能性厕所,封闭的沐浴空间,水源在其大院内或使用可重复使用的衣服的人,月经不安全总体得分(更大的不安全感)要高得多。事后探索性分析发现,报告在月经发作或工作困难时经历紧张的妇女的月经不安全分数明显更高。这个经过验证的工具对于测量月经不安全,评估健康不平等和月经不安全的相关性以及为计划设计提供信息很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号