首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >A Comparative Process Mining Analysis of Road Trauma Patient Pathways
【2h】

A Comparative Process Mining Analysis of Road Trauma Patient Pathways

机译:道路创伤患者路径的比较过程挖掘分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper we report on key findings and lessons from a process mining case study conducted to analyse transport pathways discovered across the time-critical phase of pre-hospital care for persons involved in road traffic crashes in Queensland (Australia). In this study, a case is defined as being an individual patient’s journey from roadside to definitive care. We describe challenges in constructing an event log from source data provided by emergency services and hospitals, including record linkage (no standard patient identifier), and constructing a unified view of response, retrieval, transport and pre-hospital care from interleaving processes of the individual service providers. We analyse three separate cohorts of patients according to their degree of interaction with Queensland Health’s hospital system (C1: no transport required, C2: transported but no Queensland Health hospital, C3: transported and hospitalisation). Variant analysis and subsequent process modelling show high levels of variance in each cohort resulting from a combination of data collection, data linkage and actual differences in process execution. For Cohort 3, automated process modelling generated ’spaghetti’ models. Expert-guided editing resulted in readable models with acceptable fitness, which were used for process analysis. We also conduct a comparative performance analysis of transport segment based on hospital ‘remoteness’. With regard to the field of process mining, we reach various conclusions including (i) in a complex domain, the current crop of automated process algorithms do not generate readable models, however, (ii) such models provide a starting point for expert-guided editing of models (where the tool allows) which can yield models that have acceptable quality and are readable by domain experts, (iii) process improvement opportunities were largely suggested by domain experts (after reviewing analysis results) rather than being directly derived by process mining tools, meaning that the field needs to become more prescriptive (automated derivation of improvement opportunities).
机译:在本文中,我们报告了过程采矿案例研究的主要发现和教训,该案例研究旨在分析在昆士兰州(澳大利亚)因道路交通事故而在院前护理的关键时间阶段发现的运输途径。在本研究中,病例定义为个体患者从路边到最终护理的旅程。我们描述了从应急服务和医院提供的源数据构建事件日志(包括记录链接(无标准患者标识符))以及从个人的交错过程构建响应,检索,运输和院前护理的统一视图时所面临的挑战服务供应商。我们根据患者与昆士兰健康医院系统的互动程度分析了三个独立的队列(C1:无需运输,C2:已运输,但没有昆士兰卫生医院,C3:运输和住院)。变异分析和后续的流程建模显示,由于数据收集,数据链接和流程执行中的实际差异相结合,导致每个队列的差异很大。对于同类群组3,自动流程建模生成了“意大利面”模型。专家指导的编辑产生了具有可接受的适用性的可读模型,该模型被用于过程分析。我们还根据医院的“远程性”对运输部门进行了比较绩效分析。关于过程挖掘领域,我们得出各种结论,其中包括(i)在复杂的领域中,当前的一系列自动化过程算法无法生成可读模型,但是(ii)此类模型为专家指导提供了起点编辑模型(在工具允许的情况下),该模型可以产生质量可接受且领域专家可以读取的模型;(iii)过程改进机会主要由领域专家建议(在审查分析结果之后),而不是直接由过程挖掘得出工具,这意味着该领域需要变得更具规范性(自动获得改进机会)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号