首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research >Evaluation and comparison of tools for diagnosing problematic prescription opioid use among chronic pain patients
【2h】

Evaluation and comparison of tools for diagnosing problematic prescription opioid use among chronic pain patients

机译:慢性疼痛患者中诊断有问题的处方阿片类药物使用工具的评估和比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prescription opioid medications are commonly used for the treatment of chronic pain. Assessments of problematic opioid use among pain patients are inconsistent across studies, partially due to differences between various measures. Therefore, the most appropriate measure to use is often unclear. In this study we assessed problematic opioid use in a sample of 551 individuals receiving treatment for chronic pain, using three questionnaires: the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule – Fourth Edition (AUDADIS‐IV), the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) questionnaire and Portenoy's criteria (PC). These questionnaires yielded discordant positive rates of problematic use: 52.6%, 28.7%, and 17.1%, respectively, which did not change substantially when excluding AUDADIS‐IV criteria of physical symptoms of tolerance and withdrawal. Although these three questionnaires share some statistically correlated content‐based congruent questions, positive response rates to them were significantly different based on construction features, including questionnaires' referred time‐frame, wording of questions and response alternatives. The findings of the present study illustrate strengths and limitations of the AUDADIS‐IV, COMM and PC in diagnosing problematic opioid use in a population of adults suffering from chronic pain, and highlight the importance of recognizing and addressing specific questionnaire and question‐related differences when identifying problematic opioid use in this population.
机译:处方阿片类药物通常用于治疗慢性疼痛。在各个研究中,疼痛患者中使用阿片类药物的问题评估不一致,部分原因是各种措施之间存在差异。因此,通常不清楚最适合使用的措施。在这项研究中,我们使用以下三份问卷评估了接受慢性疼痛治疗的551名个体中阿片类药物的使用问题:酒精使用障碍和相关障碍访谈时间表–第四版(AUDADIS‐IV),当前的阿片类药物滥用措施(COMM)问卷和Portenoy标准(PC)。这些问卷产生的问题使用率不一致:分别为52.6%,28.7%和17.1%,当排除AUDADIS-IV的耐受性和戒断性身体症状标准时,这些变化并没有太大变化。尽管这三份问卷共有一些统计相关的基于内容的一致问题,但根据构造特征(包括问卷的转介时间范围,问题措辞和回答备选方案),对它们的积极回答率却存在显着差异。本研究的发现说明了AUDADIS-IV,COMM和PC在诊断患有慢性疼痛的成年人中有问题的阿片类药物使用方面的优势和局限性,并着重指出了识别和解决特定问卷和与问题相关的差异时的重要性确定该人群中有问题的阿片类药物的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号