首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis >Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?
【2h】

Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?

机译:比重是否可以很好地估计尿渗透压?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

: Urine specific gravity (USG) is often used by clinicians to estimate urine osmolality. USG is measured either by refractometry or by reagent strip. : We studied the correlation of USG obtained by either method with a concurrently obtained osmolality. : Using our laboratory's records, we retrospectively gathered data on 504 urine specimens on patients on whom a simultaneously drawn USG and an osmolality were available. Out of these, 253 USG's were measured by automated refractometry and 251 USG's were measured by reagent strip. Urinalysis data on these subjects were used to determine the correlation between USG and osmolality, adjusting for other variables that may impact the relationship. The other variables considered were pH, protein, glucose, ketones, nitrates, bilirubin, urobilinogen, hemoglobin, and leukocyte esterase. The relationships were analyzed by linear regression. : This study demonstrated that USG obtained by both reagent strip and refractometry had a correlation of approximately 0.75 with urine osmolality. The variables affecting the correlation included pH, ketones, bilirubin, urobilinogen, glucose, and protein for the reagent strip and ketones, bilirubin, and hemoglobin for the refractometry method. At a pH of 7 and with an USG of 1.010 predicted osmolality is approximately 300 mosm/kg/H O for either method. For an increase in SG of 0.010, predicted osmolality increases by 182 mosm/kg/H O for the reagent strip and 203 mosm/kg/H O for refractometry. Pathological urines had significantly poorer correlation between USG and osmolality than “clean” urines. : In pathological urines, direct measurement of urine osmolality should be used. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 24:426–430, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
机译::临床医生通常使用尿比重(USG)来估计尿渗透压。 USG通过折光法或试剂带进行测量。 :我们研究了通过两种方法获得的USG与同时获得的重量克分子渗透浓度的相关性。 :使用我们的实验室记录,我们回顾性收集了504例尿液样本的数据,这些样本均可以同时绘制USG和渗透压。其中,通过自动折光法测量了253 USG,通过试剂带测量了251 USG。将这些受试者的尿液分析数据用于确定USG与渗透压之间的相关性,并调整可能影响该关系的其他变量。考虑的其他变量是pH,蛋白质,葡萄糖,酮,硝酸盐,胆红素,尿胆原原,血红蛋白和白细胞酯酶。通过线性回归分析这些关系。 :这项研究表明,通过试剂剥离法和验光法获得的USG与尿渗透压的相关性约为0.75。影响相关性的变量包括pH,酮,胆红素,尿胆原原,葡萄糖和用于试剂条的蛋白质,以及用于折光法的酮,胆红素和血红蛋白。在7的pH值和USG为1.010的情况下,两种方法的预测摩尔渗透压浓度均约为300μmosm/ kg / HO。对于SG的0.010的增加,试剂带的预测重量摩尔渗透压浓度增加182 mosm / kg / H O,折光法的预测重量摩尔渗透压浓度增加203 mosm / kg / HO。与“干净”尿相比,病理性尿在USG与重量克分子渗透压浓度之间的相关性要差得多。 :在病理性尿中,应直接测量尿渗透压。 J.临床实验室肛门24:426–430,2010年。©2010 Wiley-Liss,Inc.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号