首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>EFSA Journal >Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 61 Revision 2 (FGE.61Rev2): consideration of aliphatic acetals evaluated by JECFA (57th 63rd and 68th meetings) structurally related to acetals evaluated by EFSA in FGE.03Rev2
【2h】

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 61 Revision 2 (FGE.61Rev2): consideration of aliphatic acetals evaluated by JECFA (57th 63rd and 68th meetings) structurally related to acetals evaluated by EFSA in FGE.03Rev2

机译:关于调味料组评估的科学意见61修订版2(FGE.61Rev2):考虑JECFA(第57、63和68次会议)评估的脂肪族乙缩醛与EFSA在FGE.03Rev2中评估的乙缩醛在结构上相关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 12 flavouring substances attributed to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 61 ( .61), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation ( ) No 1565/2000. Nine substances have already been considered in .61 and .61Rev1 [ ‐no: 06.001, 06.004, 06.005, 06.008, 06.009, 06.015, 06.028, 06.037, 06.081]. The remaining three substances [ ‐no: 06.025, 06.031 and 06.072] have been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in .200Rev1 and are considered in this revision 2 of .61. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach that integrates information on the structure–activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern ( ), and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel concluded that none of the 12 substances gives rise to safety concerns at their levels of dietary intake, estimated on the basis of the ‘Maximised Survey‐derived Daily Intake’ ( ) approach. Besides the safety assessment of the flavouring substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been considered and found adequate. For nine flavouring substances [ ‐no: 06.001, 06.004, 06.005, 06.008, 06.009, 06.015, 06.028, 06.037 and 06.081], use levels are still needed to calculate the modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake ( ) values in order to identify those flavouring substances that need more refined exposure assessment and to finalise the evaluation accordingly.
机译:食品添加剂和调味料小组被要求使用委员会法规(1565/2000)中概述的程序对属于调味组评估61(.61)的12种调味物质进行评估。在.61和.61Rev1中已经考虑了九种物质[-no:06.001、06.004、06.005、06.008、06.009、06.015、06.028、06.037、06.081]。剩下的三种物质[-no:06.025、06.031和06.072]已在.200Rev1中清除了遗传毒性,并在.61的修订版2中进行了考虑。通过逐步方法对这些物质进行了评估,该方法综合了结构与活性之间的关系,当前使用的摄入量,相关的毒理学阈值()以及有关代谢和毒性的可用数据。小组得出结论认为,根据“最大调查得出的每日摄入量”()方法估算,这12种物质均未引起其饮食摄入量方面的安全性问题。除了对调味物质的安全性进行评估外,还考虑了商业材料的规格,并认为这些规格是适当的。对于9种调味物质[‐no:06.001、06.004、06.005、06.008、06.009、06.015、06.028、06.037和06.081],仍需要使用含量来计算修正的理论最大日摄入量()值,以识别这些调味剂需要更精细的暴露评估并据此最终完成评估的物质。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号