首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training Is Equally Effective Using 2D Compared to 3D Visualization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
【2h】

Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training Is Equally Effective Using 2D Compared to 3D Visualization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:与3D可视化相比使用2D进行基本腹腔镜技能培训同样有效:随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reduced depth perception due to two-dimensional (2D) visualization of a three-dimensional (3D) space represents a main challenge in acquiring basic laparoscopic skills (BLS); 3D visualization might increase training efficiency. This study aimed to assess whether BLS training on a standard box trainer using 2D is at least equally effective compared to 3D. Medical students were randomized to training of Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) tasks using either 2D or 3D for four weeks. Baseline and post-training tests were performed using the assigned visualization modality. Data of 31 participants were analyzed ( = 16 2D, = 15 3D). Baseline test scores did not differ significantly between groups; only at the peg transfer task and total scores, the 3D group performed better than the 2D group. All scores improved significantly in both groups, with post training scores not differing significantly between groups. Non-inferiority of 2D compared to 3D was demonstrated for total score improvement and improvement in all individual FLS tasks except for suturing with extracorporeal knot tying. Post training test performance did not change significantly when changing to the unfamiliar modality. In conclusion, BLS training using standard 2D is at least equally effective as with 3D, without significant disadvantages when changing to the other modality.
机译:由于三维(3D)空间的二维(2D)可视化导致深度感知降低,这是掌握腹腔镜基本技能(BLS)的主要挑战。 3D可视化可以提高培训效率。这项研究旨在评估与2D相比,使用2D在标准框式教练机上进行BLS训练是否至少同样有效。医学生被随机分配使用2D或3D进行为期4周的腹腔镜手术基础知识(FLS)任务的培训。使用分配的可视化模式执行基线和训练后测试。分析了31位参与者的数据(= 16 2D,= 15 3D)。两组之间的基线测试分数没有显着差异;仅在钉子转移任务和总得分上,3D组的表现优于2D组。两组的所有分数均有显着提高,两组之间的训练后分数无明显差异。 2D与3D相比具有非劣质性,这证明了总分的提高和所有FLS任务的改进,除了采用体外打结术进行缝合外。更改为不熟悉的方式时,训练后测试成绩没有明显变化。总之,使用标准2D进行的BLS训练至少与3D效果相同,而在转换为其他方式时没有明显的缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号