首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bioscience >Towards an Integrative Eco-Evolutionary Understanding of Ecological Novelty: Studying and Communicating Interlinked Effects of Global Change
【2h】

Towards an Integrative Eco-Evolutionary Understanding of Ecological Novelty: Studying and Communicating Interlinked Effects of Global Change

机译:寻求对生态新颖性的整体生态进化的理解:研究和交流全球变化的相互联系的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Global change has complex eco-evolutionary consequences for organisms and ecosystems, but related concepts (e.g., novel ecosystems) do not cover their full range. Here we propose an umbrella concept of “ecological novelty” comprising (1) a site-specific and (2) an organism-centered, eco-evolutionary perspective. Under this umbrella, complementary options for studying and communicating effects of global change on organisms, ecosystems, and landscapes can be included in a toolbox. This allows researchers to address ecological novelty from different perspectives, e.g., by defining it based on (a) categorical or continuous measures, (b) reference conditions related to sites or organisms, and (c) types of human activities. We suggest striving for a descriptive, non-normative usage of the term “ecological novelty” in science. Normative evaluations and decisions about conservation policies or management are important, but require additional societal processes and engagement with multiple stakeholders.
机译:全球变化对生物和生态系统具有复杂的生态进化后果,但相关概念(例如,新型生态系统)并未涵盖其全部范围。在这里,我们提出了“生态新颖性”的总体概念,包括(1)特定地点和(2)以生物体为中心的生态进化观点。在此框架下,工具箱中可以包含研究和交流全球变化对生物,生态系统和景观的影响的补充选项。这使研究人员可以从不同角度解决生态新颖性问题,例如,根据(a)分类或连续性措施,(b)与场所或生物有关的参考条件以及(c)人类活动的类型对其进行定义。我们建议努力在科学中对“生态新颖性”一词进行描述性,非规范性的使用。关于保护政策或管理的规范性评估和决策很重要,但需要额外的社会流程并需要多个利益相关者的参与。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号