首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Validation and Comparison of Water Quality Products in Baltic Lakes Using Sentinel-2 MSI and Sentinel-3 OLCI Data
【2h】

Validation and Comparison of Water Quality Products in Baltic Lakes Using Sentinel-2 MSI and Sentinel-3 OLCI Data

机译:利用Sentinel-2 MSI和Sentinel-3 OLCI数据验证和比较波罗的海水质产品

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Inland waters, including lakes, are one of the key points of the carbon cycle. Using remote sensing data in lake monitoring has advantages in both temporal and spatial coverage over traditional in-situ methods that are time consuming and expensive. In this study, we compared two sensors on different Copernicus satellites: Multispectral Instrument (MSI) on Sentinel-2 and Ocean and Land Color Instrument (OLCI) on Sentinel-3 to validate several processors and methods to derive water quality products with best performing atmospheric correction processor applied. For validation we used in-situ data from 49 sampling points across four different lakes, collected during 2018. Level-2 optical water quality products, such as chlorophyll-a and the total suspended matter concentrations, water transparency, and the absorption coefficient of the colored dissolved organic matter were compared against in-situ data. Along with the water quality products, the optical water types were obtained, because in lakes one-method-to-all approach is not working well due to the optical complexity of the inland waters. The dynamics of the optical water types of the two sensors were generally in agreement. In most cases, the band ratio algorithms for both sensors with optical water type guidance gave the best results. The best algorithms to obtain the Level-2 water quality products were different for MSI and OLCI. MSI always outperformed OLCI, with 0.84–0.97 for different water quality products. Deriving the water quality parameters with optical water type classification should be the first step in estimating the ecological status of the lakes with remote sensing.
机译:包括湖泊在内的内陆水域是碳循环的关键之一。在湖泊监测中使用遥感数据在时间和空间覆盖上均优于耗时且昂贵的传统现场方法。在这项研究中,我们比较了不同哥白尼卫星上的两个传感器:Sentinel-2上的多光谱仪器(MSI)和Sentinel-3上的海洋和陆地颜色仪器(OLCI),以验证几种处理器和方法来得出具有最佳大气性能的水质产品校正处理器已应用。为了进行验证,我们使用了来自四个不同湖泊的49个采样点的原位数据,这些数据来自2018年期间收集的。2级光学水质产品,例如叶绿素a和总悬浮物浓度,水透明度以及水体的吸收系数。将有色溶解有机物与原位数据进行比较。除了水质产品外,还获得了光学水类型,因为在湖泊中,由于内陆水域的光学复杂性,从一种方法到全部方法不能很好地工作。两个传感器的光学水类型的动力学通常是一致的。在大多数情况下,两种带光学水类型指导的传感器的带比算法都能获得最佳结果。对于MSI和OLCI,获得2级水质产品的最佳算法是不同的。 MSI始终优于OLCI,在不同水质产品上的评分为0.84-0.97。用光学水类型分类推导水质参数应该是用遥感估算湖泊生态状况的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号