首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >O3.7. SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENTS INDICATE BIOLOGICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN CANNABIS-USING AND NON-USING PATIENTS IN EARLY PSYCHOSIS
【2h】

O3.7. SMOOTH PURSUIT EYE MOVEMENTS INDICATE BIOLOGICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN CANNABIS-USING AND NON-USING PATIENTS IN EARLY PSYCHOSIS

机译:O3.7。滑顺性眼球运动表明早期精神病患者使用大麻和未使用大麻之间的生物学差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Oculomotor abnormalities are among the most widely replicated findings in psychotic disorders with impairments in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements (SPEM) and Antisaccades (AS) tasks. Cannabis-use may be a clinically relevant demarcating factor in early psychosis seen in around half of FEP patients at presentation and indicative of worse prognosis. No study to date has aimed at differentiating cannabis-using from non-using patients using AS and SPEM. Differences in eye movement measures between groups would indicate altered neurobiology between cannabis-using and non-using patients. We thus aimed to determine whether abnormalities in SPEM and AS are indicative of neurobiological differences between Early Psychosis patients who use cannabis (EPC) and those who do not use cannabis (EPNC).
机译:动眼异常是精神病性障碍中最广泛复制的发现之一,其平滑眼追踪运动(SPEM)和抗扫视(AS)任务受到损害。大麻使用可能是早期精神病的临床相关分界因素,在陈述时大约一半的FEP患者中可见,并且预后较差。迄今为止,尚无旨在区分使用大麻和使用AS和SPEM的未使用大麻的患者的研究。两组之间眼动措施的差异将表明使用大麻的和未使用大麻的患者的神经生物学改变。因此,我们旨在确定SPEM和AS的异常是否表明使用大麻(EPC)和未使用大麻(EPNC)的早期精神病患者之间的神经生物学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号