首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Permanente Journal >Refining the Definition of Polypharmacy and Its Link to Disability in Older Adults: Conceptualizing Necessary Polypharmacy Unnecessary Polypharmacy and Polypharmacy of Unclear Benefit
【2h】

Refining the Definition of Polypharmacy and Its Link to Disability in Older Adults: Conceptualizing Necessary Polypharmacy Unnecessary Polypharmacy and Polypharmacy of Unclear Benefit

机译:完善多药店的定义及其与老年人的残疾的联系:概念化必要的多药店不必要的多药店和收益不明的多药店

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The term in older adults is generally used in a pejorative context in the medical literature. Because of its link to geriatric syndromes and disability, the avoidance of polypharmacy is usually recommended in older adults as a strategy to optimize functional status. However, there are many polypharmacy regimens based on high-quality trials that clearly reduce the risk of disability in older adults. Other guidelines for older adults recommend the use of additional medications that may or may not be evidence based and that may or may not reduce disability. Therefore, we propose that, in the geriatric literature, polypharmacy now be categorized as “necessary polypharmacy,” “unnecessary polypharmacy,” or “polypharmacy of unclear benefit.” In this article, we discuss the 3 categories of polypharmacy and give examples on each polypharmacy regimen and its potential relationship to disability in older adults.
机译:老年人中的术语通常在医学文献中以贬义语使用。由于它与老年综合症和残疾有关,通常建议在老年人中避免使用多药治疗,以此作为优化机能状态的策略。但是,有许多基于高质量试验的多药治疗方案可以明显降低老年人的残疾风险。其他针对老年人的指南建议使用其他药物,这些药物可能会或可能不会基于证据,并且可能会或可能不会减少残疾。因此,我们建议,在老年医学文献中,现在将多药店分类为“必要的多药店”,“不必要的多药店”或“受益不明确的多药店”。在本文中,我们讨论了多元药房的3类,并举例说明了每种多元药房方案及其与老年人残疾的潜在关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号