首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of Culture-Based Methods for Identification of Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the Context of Cocolonization
【2h】

Comparison of Culture-Based Methods for Identification of Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the Context of Cocolonization

机译:殖民化背景下基于文化的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌和易感金黄色葡萄球菌定植方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two screening methods to detect staphylococcal colonization in humans were compared. Direct plating to CHROMagar (BD Diagnostics) was compared to a broth preenrichment followed by plating to Baird-Parker agar. The broth-enrichment method was comparable to CHROMagar for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureas (MRSA) detection, but the enrichment method was optimum for recovery of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp.
机译:比较了两种检测人类葡萄球菌定植的筛选方法。将直接铺板至CHROMagar(BD Diagnostics)与肉汤预富集进行比较,然后铺板至Baird-Parker琼脂。肉汤富集方法可与CHROMagar相比用于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的检测,但是该富集方法最适合于回收凝固酶阳性葡萄球菌的菌种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号