首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association >The International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion: Pros and cons and a review of the literature
【2h】

The International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion: Pros and cons and a review of the literature

机译:国际妇产科医师协会/国际节制学会对假体和移植物插入并发症的分类:利弊和文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS) and the Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Complications Terminology formulated a standardized terminology and classification of complications related to the use of prosthesis in female pelvic floor surgeries. It was mainly purposed to globally standardize the complications and related definitions in order to obtain factual rates and to enable comparisons and surgical audits. Although this unique classification has frequently been cited in the literature, some concerns have been raised against its complexity of use and inter- and intraobserver variability. This review aimed to discuss the rationale behind the IUGA/ICS complication classification system, underline the opposing views, and provide the Turkish version of an online calculator facilitating the universal coding to increase the utility.
机译:国际妇产科医师协会(IUGA)和国际节制学会(ICS)以及IUGA / ICS并发症联合工作组制定了标准化的术语,并对与女性盆底手术中使用假体相关的并发症进行了分类。它的主要目的是在全球范围内对并发症和相关定义进行标准化,以获取事实率并进行比较和手术审核。尽管这种独特的分类在文献中经常被引用,但是由于其使用的复杂性以及观察者之间和观察者内部的可变性,人们对此提出了一些担忧。这篇综述旨在讨论IUGA / ICS并发症分类系统背后的原理,强调反对意见,并提供土耳其语版本的在线计算器,以促进通用编码以提高实用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号