首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the cobas Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Test with the Hybrid Capture 2 and Linear Array HPV DNA Tests
【2h】

Comparison of the cobas Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Test with the Hybrid Capture 2 and Linear Array HPV DNA Tests

机译:Cobas人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)测试与Hybrid Capture 2和线性阵列HPV DNA测试的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The cobas human papillomavirus (HPV) test (cobas) was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and identifies HPV16 and HPV18 separately as well as detecting a pool of 11 HR-HPV genotypes (HPV31, -33, -35, -39, -45, -51, -52, -56, -58, -59, -68) and also HPV66. We compared cobas, Linear Array (LA), and Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) assays for detection of carcinogenic HPV DNA, and cobas and LA for detection of HPV16 and HPV18 DNA, among the first 1,852 women enrolled in the HPV Persistence and Progression Cohort (PaP Cohort) study. Specimens were tested by all 3 assays 1 year after an HC2-positive result. In 1,824 specimens with cobas results, cobas had an 85.9% agreement with HC2 and 91.0% agreement with LA for carcinogenic HPV detection. When results between cobas and HC2 disagreed, cobas tended to call more women HPV positive (P < 0.01). Categorizing cobas and LA results hierarchically according to cancer risk (HPV16, HPV18, other carcinogenic HPV genotypes, or carcinogen negative), there was a 90% agreement for all categories of HPV (n = 1,824). We found good agreement between the two U.S. FDA-approved HPV tests, with discrepancies between the two assays due to specific characteristics of the individual assays. Additional studies are needed to compare HC2 and cobas for detecting and predicting CIN3 to understand the clinical implications of the discrepant test results between the two tests.
机译:cobas人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)测试(cobas)最近获得了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的批准,可分别鉴定HPV16和HPV18以及检测11种HR-HPV基因型库(HPV31,-33,-35 ,-39,-45,-51,-52,-56,-58,-59,-68)以及HPV66。我们比较了参加HPV持久性和进展研究队列的首批1,852名女性中的cobas,线性阵列(LA)和Hybrid Capture 2(HC2)检测法检测致癌的HPV DNA,以及cobas和LA检测HPV16和HPV18 DNA的检测。 (PaP群组)研究。在HC2阳性结果1年后,通过所有3种测定法对标本进行了测试。在1,824个具有cobas结果的样本中,cobas与HC2的检测结果一致率为85.9%,与LA的检测结果一致率为91.0%。当cobas和HC2之间的结果不一致时,cobas倾向于称更多的女性HPV阳性(P <0.01)。根据癌症风险(HPV16,HPV18,其他致癌的HPV基因型或致癌物阴性)对cobas和LA结果进行分类,对于所有类别的HPV(n = 1,824)有90%的一致性。我们发现两次美国FDA批准的HPV检测之间达成了良好的协议,由于各个检测的特定特征,两次检测之间存在差异。需要进行其他研究来比较HC2和cobas,以检测和预测CIN3,以了解两次测试之间差异化的测试结果的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号