首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Exploring Triaging and Short-Term Outcomes of Early Invasive Strategy in Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Report from Japanese Multicenter Registry
【2h】

Exploring Triaging and Short-Term Outcomes of Early Invasive Strategy in Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Report from Japanese Multicenter Registry

机译:在非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征中探索早期侵入性策略的分类和短期结果:日本多中心注册中心的报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This observational study aimed to examine the extent of early invasive strategy (EIS) utilization in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) according to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI risk score, and its association with clinical outcomes. Using a prospective multicenter Japanese registry, 2968 patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention within 72 hours of hospital arrival were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of EIS utilization. Additionally, adverse outcomes were compared between patients treated with and without EIS. Overall, 82.1% of the cohort ( = 2436) were treated with EIS, and the median NCDR CathPCI risk score was 22 (interquartile range: 14–32) with an expected 0.3–0.6% in-hospital mortality. Advanced age, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease or patients without elevation of cardiac biomarkers were less likely to be treated with EIS. EIS utilization was not associated with a risk of in-hospital mortality; yet, it was associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) (adjusted odds ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 1.02–2.01) regardless of patients’ in-hospital mortality risk. Broader use of EIS utilization comes at the cost of increased AKI development risk; thus, the pre-procedural risk-benefit profile of EIS should be reassessed appropriately in patients with lower mortality risk.
机译:这项观察性研究旨在根据国家心血管数据注册中心(NCDR)CathPCI风险评分,检查非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者早期侵入性策略(EIS)的利用程度及其与临床的关系结果。使用前瞻性多中心日本注册中心,分析了2968例NSTE-ACS患者在到达医院后72小时内接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的情况。进行多变量logistic回归分析以确定EIS利用率的预测因子。此外,比较了接受和未接受EIS治疗的患者的不良结局。总体而言,队列中有82.1%(= 2436)接受了EIS治疗,NCDR CathPCI风险中位数为22(四分位间距:14-32),预期院内死亡率为0.3-0.6%。高龄,外周动脉疾病,慢性肾脏疾病或没有心脏生物标志物升高的患者不太可能接受EIS治疗。 EIS的利用与医院内死亡的风险无关;然而,无论患者有院内死亡风险如何,它都与急性肾损伤(AKI)风险增加相关(调整比值比:1.42; 95%置信区间:1.02-2.01)。 EIS利用的广泛使用是以增加AKI开发风险为代价的;因此,对于死亡率风险较低的患者,应适当地重新评估EIS的术前风险收益特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号