首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Differences in the Sub-Metatarsal Fat Pad Atrophy Symptoms between Patients with Metatarsal Head Resection and Those without Metatarsal Head Resection: A Cross-Sectional Study
【2h】

Differences in the Sub-Metatarsal Fat Pad Atrophy Symptoms between Patients with Metatarsal Head Resection and Those without Metatarsal Head Resection: A Cross-Sectional Study

机译:Meta骨头切除与不without骨头切除的患者-下脂肪垫萎缩症状的差异:横断面研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We aimed to evaluate the differences in the sub-metatarsal skin and fat pad atrophy between patients at a high risk of ulceration with and without previous metatarsal head resection. A cross-sectional study was performed in a diabetic foot unit involving 19 participants with a history of metatarsal head resection (experimental group) and 19 (control group) without a history of metatarsal head resection but with an ulcer in other locations in the metatarsal head. No participants had active ulcerations at study inclusion. Sub-metatarsal skin thickness and fat pad thickness in the first and second metatarsals were evaluated by an ultrasound transducer. The experimental group showed sub-metatarsal fat pad atrophy (3.74 ± 1.18 mm and 2.52 ± 1.04 mm for first and second metatarsal, respectively) compared with the control group (5.44 ± 1.12 mm and 4.73 ± 1.59 mm) ( < 0.001, confidence interval: (CI): 0.943–2.457 and < 0.001, CI: 1.143–3.270 for first and second metatarsal, respectively); however, sub-metatarsal skin thickness was not different between groups (experimental 2.47 ± 0.47 mm vs. control 2.80 ± 0.58 mm ( = 0.063, CI: −0.019–0.672) and 2.24 ± 0.60 mm vs. 2.62 ± 0.50 mm ( = 0.066, CI: −0.027–0.786) for first and second metatarsal, respectively). Patients with previous metatarsal head resection showed sub-metatarsal fat pad atrophy, which could be associated with the risk of reulceration in the metatarsal head.
机译:我们的目的是评估有和没有进行previous骨头部切除术的高溃疡风险患者之间的sub骨下膜皮肤和脂肪垫萎缩的差异。在糖尿病足单元中进行横断面研究,涉及19名有a骨头切除史的患者(实验组)和19名无(骨头切除史的参与者(对照组),但meta骨头其他部位有溃疡。在纳入研究时,没有参与者有活动性溃疡。通过超声换能器评估第一meta骨和第二meta骨的亚半皮肤厚度和脂肪垫厚度。与对照组(5.44±1.12 mm和4.73±1.59 mm)相比,实验组显示了met下脂肪垫萎缩(第一meta骨和第二meta骨分别为3.74±1.18 mm和2.52±1.04 mm)(<0.001,置信区间:(CI):0.943–2.457和<0.001,第一:骨和第二meta骨的CI:1.143–3.270);然而,两组间的半met上皮肤厚度没有差异(实验2.47±0.47 mm与对照组2.80±0.58 mm(= 0.063,CI:-0.019–0.672)和2.24±0.60 mm与2.62±0.50 mm(= 0.066) ,CI:-0.027-0.786)分别用于第一meta骨和第二meta骨)。先前行meta骨头切除术的患者表现出met下脂肪垫萎缩,这可能与meta骨头再溃疡的风险有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号