首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Transradial and Transfemoral Approach in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
【2h】

Transradial and Transfemoral Approach in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

机译:经Prior动脉和经股动脉入路在先行冠状动脉搭桥术中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The relationship between periprocedural complications and the type of vascular access in patients with prior history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) is less investigated than in the overall group of patients treated with PCI. The aim of the current study was to assess the relationship between the type of vascular access and selected periprocedural complications in a group of patients with prior history of CABG and treated with PCIs. Based on a Polish nationwide registry of interventional cardiology procedures called ORPKI, the authors analyzed 536,826 patients treated with PCI between 2014 and 2018. The authors extracted 32,225 cases with prior history of CABG. Then, patients with femoral and radial access as well as right and left radial access were compared. This comparison was proceeded by propensity score matching (PSM). After PSM, a multifactorial analysis revealed that patients treated with PCI from femoral access were significantly more often related to periprocedural deaths (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79; 95%, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–3.0, = 0.02) and cardiac arrests (OR: 1.98; 95%, CI: 1.38–2.87, < 0.001). After inclusion of the Killip class grade and the occurrence of cardiac arrests before PCI into the PSM, the significance remained for procedural related cardiac arrests (OR: 1.55; 95%, CI: 1.07–2.28, = 0.022]). However, a comparison of right and left radial access showed no significant differences between procedure-related complications. It has been confirmed that there is a statistical association between femoral access (compared to radial access) and a higher rate of periprocedural cardiac arrests in patients with prior history of CABG treated with PCI.
机译:与所有接受过PCI治疗的患者相比,没有冠脉搭桥术(CABG)既往病史并经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCIs)治疗的患者围手术期并发症与血管通路类型之间的关系研究较少。本研究的目的是评估一组具有CABG既往病史并接受PCIs治疗的患者的血管通路类型与选定的围手术期并发症之间的关系。基于波兰全国性的介入心脏病学程序注册表ORPKI,作者分析了2014年至2018年间536,826例接受PCI治疗的患者。作者提取了32,225例具有CABG既往史的患者。然后,比较了具有股骨和radial骨入路以及左右radial骨入路的患者。该比较通过倾向得分匹配(PSM)进行。 PSM后,一项多因素分析显示,从股骨入路接受PCI治疗的患者与术中围手术期死亡的比率更高(几率[OR]:1.79; 95%,置信区间[CI]:1.1–3.0,= 0.02)逮捕(OR:1.98; 95%,CI:1.38–2.87,<0.001)。在将Killip等级评分包括在内,并在将PCI纳入PSM之前发生心脏骤停后,与程序相关的心脏骤停的意义仍然存在(OR:1.55; 95%,CI:1.07–2.28,= 0.022])。然而,对左右radial骨入路的比较显示,与手术相关的并发症之间没有显着差异。已经证实,具有PCI治疗的CABG既往病史的患者,股骨入路(与radial门入路相比)与更高的围手术期心脏骤停之间存在统计学联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号