首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Evaluation of a new secondary dose calculation software for Gamma Knife radiosurgery
【2h】

Evaluation of a new secondary dose calculation software for Gamma Knife radiosurgery

机译:伽玛刀放射外科手术新的二次剂量计算软件的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Current available secondary dose calculation software for Gamma Knife radiosurgery falls short in situations where the target is shallow in depth or when the patient is positioned with a gamma angle other than 90°. In this work, we evaluate a new secondary calculation software which utilizes an innovative method to handle nonstandard gamma angles and image thresholding to render the skull for dose calculation. 800 treatment targets previously treated with our GammaKnife Icon system were imported from our treatment planning system (GammaPlan 11.0.3) and a secondary dose calculation was conducted. The agreement between the new calculations and the TPS were recorded and compared to the original secondary dose calculation agreement with the TPS using a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test. Further comparisons using a Mann‐Whitney test were made for targets treated at a 90° gamma angle against those treated with either a 70 or 110 gamma angle for both the new and commercial secondary dose calculation systems. Correlations between dose deviations from the treatment planning system against average target depth were evaluated using a Kendall’s Tau correlation test for both programs. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test indicated a significant difference in the agreement between the two secondary calculations and the TPS, with a ‐value P‐value
机译:在目标深度较浅或患者以90°以外的伽马角定位时,当前可用的伽马刀放射外科手术辅助剂量计算软件不足。在这项工作中,我们评估了一个新的二次计算软件,该软件利用一种创新的方法来处理非标准的伽玛角和图像阈值处理以绘制头骨进行剂量计算。从我们的治疗计划系统(GammaPlan 11.0.3)中导入了先前使用GammaKnife Icon系统治疗过的800个治疗目标,并进行了二次剂量计算。记录新计算与TPS之间的协议,并使用Wilcoxon签署秩次检验将其与TPS原始的二次剂量计算协议进行比较。对于新的和商用的二次剂量计算系统,使用Mann-Whitney测试进行了进一步比较,以90°伽玛角处理过的目标与以70或110伽玛角处理过的目标进行了比较。对于这两个程序,都使用Kendall的Tau相关检验评估了治疗计划系统的剂量偏差与平均目标深度之间的相关性。 Wilcoxon签署等级检验表明两次二次计算与TPS之间的一致性存在显着差异,其中P值为

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号