首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >PSIX-12 Meta-analysis of exercise programs implemented in the research and commercial environments that were designed to enhance Bos indicus influence cattle welfare upon entry to a feedlot.
【2h】

PSIX-12 Meta-analysis of exercise programs implemented in the research and commercial environments that were designed to enhance Bos indicus influence cattle welfare upon entry to a feedlot.

机译:PSIX-12对在研究和商业环境中实施的运动计划的荟萃分析旨在增强Bos indicus影响进入饲养场的牲畜福利。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To quantify the impact of two exercise programs against a control, two companion projects were conducted simultaneously across 30 days: one in a research setting (n = 210 weanling calves; 12 pens @ 4 pens/trt) and one in a commercial setting (n = 688 yearling calves; 6 pens @ 2 pens/trt). Calves were sorted by sex and placed into pens; treatments were applied to the entire pen 3x/wk for 4 wk and behavioral observations were conducted weekly on days that cattle were not engaged in their assigned exercise program. Pens were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: 1) programmatic exercise (PRO; cattle moved to drive alley and encouraged to maintain movement for 20 min), 2) free exercise (FREE; cattle moved to drive alley, and allowed free movement without access to the pen for 60 min) or 3) no exercise (CON). Cattle behavior and productivity were measured in both studies. General Linear Mixed models evaluated the impact of treatment, study, and week on behavior, including pen within treatment and week within pen x treatment x study interaction as random effects. No treatment x study interactions were observed for ADG (P=0.11) or F:G (P=0.11). Study x week interactions (P<0.01) were observed for lying, standing, walking, drinking, and ruminating whilst a tendency (P<0.01) was observed for social behaviors. A larger proportion of calves ate simultaneously in the research setting compared to the commercial setting (P<0.01). Differences between the two studies may be attributed to age (weanling vs. yearling in the research and commercial settings, respectively), diet, or stocking density (34.9 vs. 30.1 cm feedbunk space/animal for the research and commercial settings, respectively). Both research and commercial experiments demonstrate that these exercise treatments did not alter cattle productivity or behavior.
机译:为了量化两个锻炼计划对对照组的影响,在30天之内同时进行了两个陪伴项目:一个在研究环境中(n = 210头断奶犊牛; 12支@ 4笔/ trt),另一个在商业环境中(n = 688羽一岁小牛; 6笔@ 2笔/吨)。小牛按性别分类并放入围栏;对整个围栏以3x / wk进行处理,每周进行4周,并在牛没有参加其指定的运动计划的那一天每周进行行为观察。将钢笔随机分配给以下三种治疗方法之一:1)程序锻炼(PRO;牛移动到小巷并鼓励保持运动20分钟),2)自由运动(免费;牛移动到小巷,并且允许自由运动而没有可以使用笔60分钟)或3)不进行任何操作(CON)。两项研究均对牛的行为和生产力进行了测量。通用线性混合模型评估了治疗,研究和行为一周对行为的影响,包括治疗内的笔和行为x内的一周x研究x交互作用作为随机效应。对于ADG(P = 0.11)或F:G(P = 0.11),未观察到任何治疗x研究相互作用。躺卧,站立,行走,饮水和反刍的研究x周交互作用(P <0.01)被观察到,而社交行为的趋势则被观察到(P <0.01)。与商业饲养相比,在研究环境中同时食用的犊牛比例更大(P <0.01)。两项研究之间的差异可能归因于年龄(分别在研究和商业环境中的断奶和一岁),饮食或放养密度(在研究和商业环境中,动物粪便的空间/动物分别为34.9厘米和30.1厘米)。研究和商业实验均表明,这些运动疗法不会改变牛的生产力或行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号