首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Understanding Environmental Pollutions of Informal E-Waste Clustering in Global South via Multi-Scalar Regulatory Frameworks: A Case Study of Guiyu Town China
【2h】

Understanding Environmental Pollutions of Informal E-Waste Clustering in Global South via Multi-Scalar Regulatory Frameworks: A Case Study of Guiyu Town China

机译:通过多尺度监管框架了解全球南方非正式电子废物集群的环境污染:以中国贵屿镇为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The recycling of e-waste by the informal sector has brought countries in the Global South raw materials (e.g. metals and plastics), second-hand electronic equipment and components, and economic opportunities in conjunction with appalling environmental pollutions and health problems. Despite the longstanding international and national legislation regulating transnational trade and domestic recycling, informal e-waste economies are still clustering in many Global South countries. This study offers historically and geographically specific explanations of this conundrum, by interrogating the multi-scalar regulatory frameworks in which the informal e-waste economies and their pollutions are embedded, by drawing on China, particularly the former global e-waste hub-Guiyu town, as the case study. We argue that the contested and problematic application of current international and national legislation in regulating e-waste is in part pertaining to the slippery definition of what counts as “e-waste” and its paradoxical nature as both resources and pollutants. At the global scale, trajectories of global e-waste flows are shaped by the multitude of loopholes, contradictions and ambiguous articles left by the Basel Convention and by different countries’ disparate attitudes towards the e-waste trade. At the national scale, the ambiguities and contradictions in the Basel Convention have been passed on to and shaped China’s national e-waste regulatory frameworks. China’s equivocal legislation, paradoxical attitude, and formal enterprises’ weak competence contribute to the rise of informal e-waste recycling in Guiyu. Yet, China’s e-waste regime has been greatly restructured within the past decade, with formal recycling enterprises playing an increasingly significant role.
机译:非正规部门对电子废物的回收已经为全球南方的国家带来了原材料(例如金属和塑料),二手电子设备和组件以及经济机会,同时还带来了令人震惊的环境污染和健康问题。尽管制定了长期的国际和国内法规来规范跨国贸易和国内回收利用,但非正式的电子废物经济仍在许多全球南方国家聚集。这项研究通过询问中国,特别是以前的全球电子废物中心-贵屿镇,通过质疑嵌入非正规电子废物经济及其污染的多尺度监管框架,为这一难题提供了历史和地理上的具体解释。 ,作为案例研究。我们认为,当前的国际和国家法规在规范电子废物方面存在争议和有问题的应用,部分原因在于对“电子废物”的定义模糊不清,以及其既作为资源又作为污染物的自相矛盾的性质。在全球范围内,全球电子废物流动的轨迹是由《巴塞尔公约》所留下的众多漏洞,矛盾和模棱两可的,以及不同国家对电子废物贸易的不同态度所决定的。在全国范围内,《巴塞尔公约》中的歧义和矛盾已经传递并塑造了中国的国家电子废物监管框架。中国模棱两可的立法,自相矛盾的态度以及正规企业的能力薄弱,导致了贵屿市非正式电子垃圾回收的兴起。但是,过去十年来,中国的电子废物管理体制已经得到了很大的调整,正规的回收企业在其中扮演着越来越重要的角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号