首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Capacity Building in Community Stakeholder Groups for Increasing Physical Activity: Results of a Qualitative Study in Two German Communities
【2h】

Capacity Building in Community Stakeholder Groups for Increasing Physical Activity: Results of a Qualitative Study in Two German Communities

机译:社区利益相关者团体增加体育锻炼的能力建设:两个德国社区的定性研究结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Community capacity building is an essential approach for health promotion, combining a participatory approach with the view to community ownership. Little research focuses on practical capacity building strategies and monitoring. Our paper looks into involving stakeholders in facilitated group discussions as a specific strategy for fostering capacity building processes. These processes focused on physical activity (PA) promotion in two German communities (ACTION4men). Along the dimensions of capacity building suggested in literature (e.g., problem solving, resource mobilization, leadership), we implemented two participatory stakeholder groups (1/community). These groups were motivated to develop and implement PA interventions for men >50 years. For measuring capacity building processes, a semi-standardized monitoring instrument was used to document all group meetings. Additionally, we conducted semi-standardized interviews with group participants and drop-outs to capture their perspectives on capacity building. All documents were analyzed using thematic analysis. We successfully established stakeholder groups that planned and implemented a range of local measures meant to increase PA among older men. In one community, the process was sustainable, whereby the group continued to meet regularly over years. Capacity building was successful to a certain degree (e.g., regarding participation, problem assessment, and resource mobilization), but stalled after first meetings. Capacity building processes differed between the two communities in terms of leadership and sustainability. The developed interventions mainly addressed the access to organized sport courses, rather than tackling walkability or active transport. The theoretical capacity building approach was successful to develop and implement programs aimed at promoting PA. The actual capacity building processes depend upon the composition of stakeholder groups and inherent power relations.
机译:社区能力建设是促进健康的基本方法,将参与性方法与社区所有权相结合。很少有研究侧重于实际能力建设策略和监控。本文探讨了让利益相关者参与促进的小组讨论,以此作为促进能力建设过程的一种特殊策略。这些过程的重点是在两个德国社区(ACTION4men)中促进体育锻炼(PA)。沿用文献中建议的能力建设的维度(例如,解决问题,动员资源,领导能力),我们实施了两个参与性利益相关者群体(1 /社区)。这些团体的动机是为50岁以上的男性制定和实施PA干预措施。为了衡量能力建设过程,使用了一个半标准化的监控工具来记录所有小组会议。此外,我们对小组参与者和辍学者进行了半标准化的采访,以了解他们对能力建设的看法。使用主题分析对所有文档进行了分析。我们成功地建立了利益相关者团体,他们计划并实施了一系列旨在提高老年男性PA的地方措施。在一个社区中,该过程是可持续的,因此该小组多年来持续定期开会。能力建设在一定程度上取得了成功(例如,在参与,问题评估和资源筹集方面),但在第一次会议后停滞了。在领导能力和可持续性方面,两个社区之间的能力建设过程有所不同。制定的干预措施主要解决了参加有组织的体育课程的问题,而不是解决步行性或主动运输的问题。理论上的能力建设方法成功地制定和实施了旨在促进巴勒斯坦权力机构的计划。实际的能力建设过程取决于利益相关者群体的组成和固有的权力关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号