首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Evaluating the Investment Projects of Spinal Medical Device Firms Using the Real Option and DANP-mV Based MCDM Methods
【2h】

Evaluating the Investment Projects of Spinal Medical Device Firms Using the Real Option and DANP-mV Based MCDM Methods

机译:使用实物期权和基于DANP-mV的MCDM方法评估脊柱医疗器械企业的投资项目

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In an era of global aging, spinal and other joint degeneration issues have become a major problem for many elders. Bone-related operations have become the largest percentage of surgeries, accounting for 40% of the top 10 operations in the United States. Further, these spine-related operations are now ranked second among all bone-related operations. Due to this enormous and daily increasing market demand, more and more firms have started to pay closer attention to related medical devices and products. The global venture capitalists (VCs) have also started to follow the mega trend and will continue to invest heavily in this industry. Although most VCs recognize that investing in firms that produce innovative spinal products or devices is a must, very few practical managers or research scholars have defined the appropriate evaluation methods for these firms to use. The traditional net present value (NPV) method, which does not consider operation flexibility and changes in strategy, is far from the reality. The real option method can reveal the vagueness and flexibilities of the values being embedded in the investment projects at spinal medical device firms. However, the real option method is strictly quantitative. Usually, the evaluation aspects contain qualitative factors or local criteria which are hard to quantify in monetary terms. Thus, the adoption of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods that can manipulate both quantitative and qualitative factors will be very helpful in evaluating and selecting investment cases like the spinal medical device firms, where both quantitative and qualitative factors should be considered. An analytical framework that consists of hybrid MCDM methods and the real option method will thus be very useful to evaluate the newly established firms producing spinal medical devices. Therefore, the authors propose a real option valuation as well as the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) based analytic network process (DANP) and the modified VIšekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) method (DANP-mV) based MCDM framework for evaluating the investment projects offered by these firms of spinal medical devices. An empirical study based on three newly established spinal medical device companies specializing in vertebral compression fracture (VCF) surgical devices was used to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed analytical framework. Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine the influence of modeling parameters on ranking results of alternatives. This analytical framework can thus serve as a tool for VCs to use to determine the value of a potential candidate for investment. The proposed method can also serve as an effective and efficient tool for investment projects in other fields.
机译:在全球老龄化时代,脊柱和其他关节退行性疾病已成为许多老年人的主要问题。与骨相关的手术已成为外科手术的最大百分比,占美国前十大手术的40%。此外,这些与脊柱相关的手术现在在所有与骨骼相关的手术中排名第二。由于这种巨大且每天不断增长的市场需求,越来越多的公司开始更加密切地关注相关的医疗设备和产品。全球风险资本家(VC)也已开始跟随这一大趋势,并将继续对该行业进行大量投资。尽管大多数风险投资家都认为必须对生产创新型脊柱产品或器械的公司进行投资,但很少有实际的经理或研究学者为这些公司定义合适的评估方法。传统的净现值(NPV)方法没有考虑操作的灵活性和策略的变化,与实际情况相去甚远。实物期权方法可以揭示嵌入在脊柱医疗器械公司投资项目中的价值的模糊性和灵活性。但是,实物期权方法是严格定量的。通常,评估方面包含定性因素或本地标准,很难用金钱来量化。因此,采用可以同时控制定量和定性因素的多标准决策(MCDM)方法将对评估和选择像脊柱医疗器械公司这样的投资案例非常有帮助,在这种情况下应同时考虑定量和定性因素。因此,由混合MCDM方法和实物期权方法组成的分析框架对于评估新成立的生产脊柱医疗器械的公司将非常有用。因此,作者提出了实物期权评估以及基于决策试验和评估实验室(DEMATEL)的分析网络过程(DANP),并提出了基于改进的VIšekriterijumskoKOmpromisno Rangiranje(VIKOR)方法(DANP-mV)的MCDM框架进行评估这些脊柱医疗器械公司提供的投资项目。基于三个新成立的专门从事椎骨压缩性骨折(VCF)外科器械的脊柱医疗器械公司的实证研究,以证明所提出的分析框架的可行性。进行敏感性分析以确定建模参数对替代方案排名结果的影响。因此,该分析框架可以用作风险投资工具确定潜在候选投资人价值的工具。提出的方法还可以作为其他领域投资项目的有效工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号