首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Relative Risk of High-Danger Industries in China from 2004 to 2016
【2h】

Relative Risk of High-Danger Industries in China from 2004 to 2016

机译:2004年至2016年中国高危行业的相对风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accidents in high-danger industries in China occur frequently and cause loss of life, injuries, and economic loss. One of the most important reasons causing severe safety situations is the lack of knowledge on macro industry risk in the practice and academic field in China. In order to solve this problem, the method to calculate group risk and individual risk, concerning risk aversion, is discussed, selected, and improved. The group risks and individual risks of five high-danger industries from 2004 to 2016 are calculated. Relative risk indices between five high-danger industries during the 11 and 12 Five-Year Guideline for National Economic and Social Development (FYP) are determined. The results show that there are some differences between group risk and individual risk of high-danger industries. The reasons for differences and the connections with published interventions are discussed. Through discussion, two different ways to reduce group risk and individual risk are identified, which could help supervisors inspect the actual effectiveness of safety policies, measures, and interventions and choose a better way to reduce risk and ensure work safety in industries.
机译:中国高危行业的事故频发,造成人员伤亡和经济损失。造成严重安全状况的最重要原因之一是在中国的实践和学术领域缺乏对宏观行业风险的知识。为了解决这个问题,讨论,选择和改进了涉及风险​​规避的群体风险和个人风险的计算方法。计算了2004年至2016年五个高风险行业的群体风险和个人风险。确定了国民经济和社会发展“十一五”和“十二五”五年指南中五个高危行业之间的相对风险指数。结果表明,高风险行业的群体风险和个人风险之间存在一些差异。讨论了差异的原因以及与已发布的干预措施的联系。通过讨论,确定了降低群体风险和个人风险的两种不同方法,可以帮助监管者检查安全政策,措施和干预措施的实际有效性,并选择一种更好的方法来降低风险并确保行业的工作安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号