首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The International Journal of Angiology : Official Publication of the International College of Angiology Inc >Simplified Rapid Protocol for Assessing the Thoracic Aortic Dimensions and Pathology with Noncontrast MR Angiography
【2h】

Simplified Rapid Protocol for Assessing the Thoracic Aortic Dimensions and Pathology with Noncontrast MR Angiography

机译:非对比MR血管造影术评估胸主动脉尺寸和病理的简化快速方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is limited by long acquisition time and contrast exposure in aortic emergencies. To compare the effcacy of dark blood (DB) and bright blood (BB) noncontrast sequences with the gold standard CE-MRA using a novel protocol for performing consistent thoracic aortic measurements and thoracic aortic pathologies identifications. A total of 66 patients with suspected or known thoracic aortic pathology who underwent CE-MRA underwent DB and BB imaging prior to CE-MRA for planning purposes. Aortic dimension was measured at 10 standard reference points in the ascending, arch, and descending aorta. Detection of aortic pathologies was recorded individually for each noncontrast sequence. When comparing the CE-MRA to the DB images and CE-MRA to the BB images, a majority of the measurement differences were less than or equal to 2 mm or resulted in no change of diagnostic class (95% for CE-MRA vs. DB and 96% for CE-MRA vs. BB). Of the patients who had major changes in diagnostic class (e.g., changes in two or three classes), the absolute measurements were not clinically significant in any given patient to warrant a change in management. Individually, the DB and BB sequences allowed for accurate recognition of all 47 aortic pathologies. DB and BB sequences produced comparable and consistent measurements of the thoracic aorta when compared with CE-MRA. In a situation where CE-MRA is not readily available or contraindicated, noncontrast MRA using our protocol is a reliable alternative to CE-MRA for assessment of aortic pathologies.
机译:对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)受较长的采集时间和主动脉紧急情况下对比剂暴露的限制。为了比较暗血(DB)和亮血(BB)非对比序列与金标准CE-MRA的疗效,使用一种新颖的协议进行一致的胸主动脉测量和胸主动脉病理学鉴定。总共有66位怀疑或已知胸主动脉病变的患者,为了计划目的,在进行CE-MRA之前接受了CE-MRA的DB和BB显像。在升主动脉,弓和降主动脉的10个标准参考点处测量主动脉尺寸。对于每个非对比序列,分别记录主动脉病变的检测。当比较CE-MRA与DB图像和CE-MRA与BB图像时,大多数测量差异小于或等于2mm,或者没有导致诊断级别的变化(CE-MRA与95%相比)。 DB和CE-MRA与BB的比例为96%)。在诊断级别发生重大变化(例如,两级或三级变化)的患者中,绝对值对任何给定患者的临床意义均不显着,以保证管理上的改变。分别通过DB和BB序列可以准确识别所有47种主动脉病变。与CE-MRA相比,DB和BB序列可对胸主动脉进行比较和一致的测量。在CE-MRA尚不可用或禁忌的情况下,使用我们的协议的非对比MRA是CE-MRA评估主动脉病变的可靠替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号