首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Heliyon >Induction approach via P-Graph to rank clean technologies
【2h】

Induction approach via P-Graph to rank clean technologies

机译:通过P-Graph的归纳方法对清洁技术进行排名

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Identification of appropriate clean technologies for industrial implementation requires systematic evaluation based on a set of criteria that normally reflect economic, technical, environmental and other aspects. Such multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) problems involve rating a finite set of alternatives with respect to multiple potentially conflicting criteria. Conventional MADM approaches often involve explicit trade-offs in between criteria based on the expert's or decision maker's priorities. In practice, many experts arrive at decisions based on their tacit knowledge. This paper presents a new induction approach, wherein the implicit preference rules that estimate the expert's thinking pathways can be induced. P-graph framework is applied to the induction approach as it adds the advantage of being able to determine both optimal and near-optimal solutions that best approximate the decision structure of an expert. The method elicits the knowledge of experts from their ranking of a small set of sample alternatives. Then, the information is processed to induce implicit rules which are subsequently used to rank new alternatives. Hence, the expert's preferences are approximated by the new rankings. The proposed induction approach is demonstrated in the case study on the ranking of Negative Emission Technologies (NETs) viability for industry implementation.
机译:为工业实施确定适当的清洁技术需要根据通常反映经济,技术,环境和其他方面的一组标准进行系统评估。此类多属性决策(MADM)问题涉及针对多个潜在冲突的标准对一组有限的备选方案进行评级。传统的MADM方法通常会根据专家或决策者的优先级在标准之间进行明确的权衡。实际上,许多专家是基于他们的默认知识做出决策的。本文提出了一种新的归纳方法,其中可以引入隐含的偏好规则,该规则估计专家的思维路径。 P-graph框架被应用到归纳方法,因为它增加了能够确定最接近专家决策结构的最优和近优解决方案的优势。该方法从专家对一小组样本备选方案的排名中吸取了知识。然后,对信息进行处理以引入隐式规则,随后将其用于对新的替代方案进行排名。因此,专家的偏好可以通过新的排名进行估算。在对行业实施负排放技术(NETs)生存能力进行排名的案例研究中证明了拟议的诱导方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号