首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Translational Science >3256 Effectiveness of Shared Decision-Making for Diabetes Prevention: 12-month Results from the Prediabetes Informed Decision and Education (PRIDE) Randomized Trial
【2h】

3256 Effectiveness of Shared Decision-Making for Diabetes Prevention: 12-month Results from the Prediabetes Informed Decision and Education (PRIDE) Randomized Trial

机译:3256糖尿病预防共享决策的有效性:糖尿病前知情决策和教育(PRIDE)随机试验的12个月结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Intensive lifestyle change (e.g., the Diabetes Prevention Program) and metformin reduce type 2 diabetes risk among patients with prediabetes. However, real-world uptake remains low. Shared decision-making (SDM) may increase awareness and help patients select and follow through with informed options for diabetes prevention that are aligned with their preferences.The objective was to test the effectiveness of a prediabetes SDM intervention. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This was a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 20 primary care clinics within a large regional health system. Participants were overweight/obese adults with prediabetes (BMI>24 kg/m2 and HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) were enrolled from 10 SDM intervention clinics. Propensity score matching was used to identify control patients from 10 usual care clinics.Intervention clinic patients were invited to participate in a face-to-face SDM visit with a pharmacist who used a decision aid (DA) to describe prediabetes and four possible options for diabetes prevention; DPP, DPP +/− metformin, metformin only, or usual care. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Uptake of DPP and/or metformin was higher among SDM participants (n=351) than controls receiving usual care (n = 1,028; 38% vs. 2%, p<.001). At 12-months follow-up, adjusted weight loss (lbs.) was greater among SDM participants than controls (−5.3 vs. −0.2, p < .001). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: A prediabetes SDM intervention led by pharmacists increased patient engagement in evidence-based options for diabetes prevention and was associated with significantly greater uptake of DPP and/or metformin at 4-months and weight loss at 12-months. Prediabetes SDM may be a promising approach to enhance prevention efforts among patients at increased risk.
机译:目标/特定目标:严格的生活方式改变(例如,糖尿病预防计划)和二甲双胍可降低糖尿病前期患者的2型糖尿病风险。但是,现实世界中的吸收率仍然很低。共享决策(SDM)可能会提高认识,并帮助患者选择和遵循与他们的喜好相匹配的预防糖尿病的明智选择。目的是检验糖尿病前SDM干预的有效性。方法/研究人群:这是一项在大型区域卫生系统中的20家初级保健诊所进行的随机分组对照试验。研究对象是来自10个SDM干预诊所的超重/肥胖型糖尿病前期成年人(BMI> 24 kg / m2和HbA1c 5.7-6.4%)。倾向得分匹配用于识别10家常规护理诊所的对照患者。邀请干预诊所的患者与一名药剂师进行面对面的SDM拜访,该药剂师使用决策辅助(DA)来描述糖尿病的前兆和四种可能的选择糖尿病预防DPP,DPP +/-二甲双胍,仅二甲双胍或常规护理。结果/预期结果:SDM参与者中的DPP和/或二甲双胍的摄入量(n = 351)高于接受常规护理的对照组(n = 1,028; 38%对2%,p <.001)。在12个月的随访中,SDM参与者的调整后体重减轻(lbs。)大于对照组(-5.3 vs.-0.2,p <.001)。讨论/意义:由药剂师领导的糖尿病前SDM干预使患者更多地参与基于证据的糖尿病预防选择,并且与4个月时DPP和/或二甲双胍的摄入量显着增加以及12个月时的体重减轻有关。糖尿病前期SDM可能是在风险较高的患者中加强预防工作的一种有前途的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号