首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>eLife >Distinct neural contributions to metacognition for detecting but not discriminating visual stimuli
【2h】

Distinct neural contributions to metacognition for detecting but not discriminating visual stimuli

机译:神经元对元认知的贡献用于检测但不能区分视觉刺激

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Being confident in whether a stimulus is present or absent (a detection judgment) is qualitatively distinct from being confident in the identity of that stimulus (a discrimination judgment). In particular, in detection, evidence can only be available for the presence, not the absence, of a target object. This asymmetry suggests that higher-order cognitive and neural processes may be required for confidence in detection, and more specifically, in judgments about absence. In a within-subject, pre-registered and performance-matched fMRI design, we observed quadratic confidence effects in frontopolar cortex for detection but not discrimination. Furthermore, in the right temporoparietal junction, confidence effects were enhanced for judgments of target absence compared to judgments of target presence. We interpret these findings as reflecting qualitative differences between a neural basis for metacognitive evaluation of detection and discrimination, potentially in line with counterfactual or higher-order models of confidence formation in detection.
机译:从本质上说,对刺激是否存在(检测判断)充满信心与对刺激的身份(辨别判断)充满信心。特别地,在检测中,证据仅可用于目标物体的存在而不是不存在。这种不对称性表明,可能需要更高阶的认知和神经过程来增强检测的信心,更具体地说,是对不存在的判断要有信心。在受试者内部,预先注册和性能匹配的功能磁共振成像设计中,我们观察到了额极皮层的二次置信度效应,可进行检测,但不能进行区分。此外,与目标存在的判断相比,在右侧颞顶交界处,对目标缺失的判断置信度得到了增强。我们将这些发现解释为反映了对检测和歧视进行元认知评估的神经基础之间的质量差异,这可能与检测中的置信度形成反事实或更高阶模型相符。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号