首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Red oak seedlings as indicators of deer browse pressure: Gauging the outcome of different white‐tailed deer management approaches
【2h】

Red oak seedlings as indicators of deer browse pressure: Gauging the outcome of different white‐tailed deer management approaches

机译:红橡树幼苗作为鹿的浏览压力指标:衡量不同白尾鹿管理方法的成果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

After decades of high deer populations, North American forests have lost much of their previous biodiversity. Any landscape‐level recovery requires substantial reductions in deer herds, but modern societies and wildlife management agencies appear unable to devise appropriate solutions to this chronic ecological and human health crisis. We evaluated the effectiveness of fertility control and hunting in reducing deer impacts at Cornell University. We estimated spring deer populations and planted seedlings to assess deer browse pressure, rodent attack, and other factors compromising seedling performance. Oak seedlings protected in cages grew well, but deer annually browsed ≥60% of unprotected seedlings. Despite female sterilization rates of >90%, the deer population remained stable. Neither sterilization nor recreational hunting reduced deer browse rates and neither appears able to achieve reductions in deer populations or their impacts. We eliminated deer sterilization and recreational hunting in a core management area in favor of allowing volunteer archers to shoot deer over bait, including at night. This resulted in a substantial reduction in the deer population and a linear decline in browse rates as a function of spring deer abundance. Public trust stewardship of North American landscapes will require a fundamental overhaul in deer management to provide for a brighter future, and oak seedlings may be a promising metric to assess success. These changes will require intense public debate and may require new approaches such as regulated commercial hunting, natural dispersal, or intentional release of important deer predators (e.g., wolves and mountain lions). Such drastic changes in deer management will be highly controversial, and at present, likely difficult to implement in North America. However, the future of our forest ecosystems and their associated biodiversity will depend on evidence to guide change in landscape management and stewardship.
机译:在数十年的高鹿种群数量之后,北美森林已经丧失了许多以前的生物多样性。任何景观一级的恢复都需要大幅度减少鹿群,但是现代社会和野生动植物管理机构似乎无法针对这种长期的生态和人类健康危机制定适当的解决方案。我们在康奈尔大学评估了生育控制和狩猎对减少鹿的影响的有效性。我们估计了春季鹿的种群和种植的苗木,以评估鹿的浏览压力,啮齿动物的攻击以及其他损害苗木性能的因素。笼子内受保护的橡树幼苗生长良好,但每年鹿浏览的未保护树种≥60%。尽管雌性绝育率> 90%,但鹿群仍保持稳定。绝育和休闲狩猎都不会降低鹿的浏览率,而且似乎都无法减少鹿的数量或其影响。我们取消了核心管理区域内的鹿绝育和休闲狩猎,以允许志愿弓箭手在诱饵上射杀鹿,包括在夜间。这导致了鹿种群的大量减少,浏览率随春季鹿的丰度而线性下降。公众对北美景观的信任管理将需要对鹿的管理进行根本性的改革,以提供更光明的未来,橡树幼苗可能是评估成功的有希望的指标。这些变化将需要激烈的公众辩论,并可能需要新的方法,例如受监管的商业狩猎,自然传播或有意释放重要的鹿天敌(例如狼和美洲狮)。鹿管理方面的这种急剧变化将引起高度争议,目前在北美可能难以实施。但是,我们森林生态系统及其相关生物多样性的未来将取决于指导景观管理和管理变化的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号