首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Amino acid δ15N underestimation of cetacean trophic positions highlights limited understanding of isotopic fractionation in higher marine consumers
【2h】

Amino acid δ15N underestimation of cetacean trophic positions highlights limited understanding of isotopic fractionation in higher marine consumers

机译:鲸类营养位置的氨基酸δ15N低估凸显了高级海洋消费者对同位素分馏的了解有限

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Compound‐specific stable isotope analysis (CSIA) of amino acids (AAs) has been rapidly incorporated in ecological studies to resolve consumer trophic position (TP). Differential N fractionation of “trophic” AAs, which undergo trophic N enrichment, and “source” AAs, which undergo minimal trophic N enrichment and serve as a proxy for primary producer δ N values, allows for internal calibration of TP. Recent studies, however, have shown the difference between source and trophic AA δ N values in higher marine consumers is less than predicted from empirical studies of invertebrates and fish. To evaluate CSIA‐AA for estimating TP of cetaceans, we compared source and trophic AA δ N values of multiple tissues (skin, baleen, and dentine collagen) from five species representing a range of TPs: bowhead whales, beluga whales, short‐beaked common dolphins, sperm whales, and fish‐eating (FE) and marine mammal‐eating (MME) killer whale ecotypes. TP estimates (TP ) using several empirically derived equations and trophic discrimination factors (TDFs) were 1–2.5 trophic steps lower than stomach content‐derived estimates (TP ) for all species. Although TP estimates using dual TDF equations were in better agreement with TP estimates, our data do not support the application of universal or currently available dual TDFs to estimate cetacean TPs. Discrepancies were not simply due to inaccurate TDFs, however, because the difference between consumer glutamic acid/glutamine (Glx) and phenylalanine (Phe) δ N values (δ N ) did not follow expected TP order. In contrast to pioneering studies on invertebrates and fish, our data suggest trophic N enrichment of Phe is not negligible and should be examined among the potential mechanisms driving “compressed” and variable δ N values at high TPs. We emphasize the need for controlled diet studies to understand mechanisms driving AA‐specific isotopic fractionation before widespread application of CSIA‐AA in ecological studies of cetaceans and other marine consumers.
机译:氨基酸(AAs)的化合物特异性稳定同位素分析(CSIA)已迅速纳入生态学研究中,以解决消费者的营养位点(TP)。进行营养性N富集的“营养” AA的差分N分馏和进行最小营养性N富集并用作主要生产者δN值的代理的“源” AA允许对TP进行内部校准。然而,最近的研究表明,较高的海洋消费者的营养和营养AAδN值之间的差异小于无脊椎动物和鱼类的经验研究所预测的差异。为了评估CSIA-AA估算鲸类TP的能力,我们比较了代表一系列TP的五个物种(弓头鲸,白鲸,短喙)的多种组织(皮肤,巴林和牙本质胶原)的源和营养AAδN值。常见的海豚,抹香鲸和鱼类(FE)和海洋哺乳动物(MME)虎鲸的生态型。使用多个经验推导方程和营养歧视因子(TDF)得出的TP估计值(TP)比所有物种的胃含量衍生估计值(TP)低1-2.5个营养步骤。尽管使用双重TDF方程进行的TP估计与TP估计更好地吻合,但我们的数据不支持使用通用或当前可用的双重TDF来估计鲸类TP。差异不只是由于TDF不准确造成的,而是因为消费者谷氨酸/谷氨酰胺(Glx)和苯丙氨酸(Phe)之间的差异δN值(δN)没有遵循预期的TP顺序。与对无脊椎动物和鱼类的开创性研究相反,我们的数据表明,Phe的营养氮富集不可忽略,应在高TP下驱动“压缩”和可变δN值的潜在机制中进行研究。我们强调必须进行饮食控制研究,以便在将CSIA-AA广泛应用于鲸类和其他海洋生物的生态研究之前,了解驱动AA特异性同位素分馏的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号