首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Data in Brief >Data on the hemostasis in epistaxis with Topically Administered TXA Versus Topical Oxymetazoline Spray
【2h】

Data on the hemostasis in epistaxis with Topically Administered TXA Versus Topical Oxymetazoline Spray

机译:局部使用TXA与局部用氧甲唑啉喷雾进行鼻epi止血的数据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has recently gained popularity as a treatment modality for epistaxis in the emergency department. Data are presented on the efficacy of the topical use of the intravenous formulation of TXA versus the vasoconstrictor oxymetazoline applied topically in achieving hemostasis in patient presenting to the emergency department with anterior epistaxis. The original article “Comparative Effectiveness of Topically Administered TXA Versus Topical Oxymetazoline Spray for Achieving Hemostasis in Epistaxis” [1] provides complete interpretation of the data. The dataset regarding these treatment modalities has clinical significance toward preventing an avoidable need for escalation of treatment that could potentially increase patient discomfort and prolong emergency department throughput time.
机译:氨甲环酸(TXA)的使用最近在急诊科中成为流行性鼻炎的治疗手段。数据显示了局部使用TXA静脉给药与局部应用血管收缩剂羟甲唑啉实现止血的效果,这些患者在前鼻出血的急诊科就诊。原始文章“局部给药的TXA与局部用氧代甲唑啉喷雾剂在鼻出血中实现止血的比较效果” [1]提供了对数据的完整解释。有关这些治疗方式的数据集对于预防可避免的治疗升级需求具有临床意义,因为这种升级可能潜在地增加患者的不适感并延长急诊科的处理时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号