首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Microbiology >Comparison of the Denka Seiken Slide Agglutination Method to the Quellung Test for Serogrouping of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates
【2h】

Comparison of the Denka Seiken Slide Agglutination Method to the Quellung Test for Serogrouping of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates

机译:Denka Seiken玻片凝集法与Quellung试验比较肺炎链球菌分离株血清群的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared a slide agglutination test (Denka Seiken, Tokyo, Japan) to the “gold standard” quellung reaction (Pneumotest; Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark) for the serogrouping of pneumococci. Two hundred clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were used for the comparison. Each assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. There was an overall agreement of 95.7% between the two methods. Only 4 of 10 isolates of serogroup 22 were detected with the slide agglutination assay. Two isolates that were untypeable by the Pneumotest method were typed as serogroups 6 and 31 by the slide agglutination method. The Pneumotest method was unable to type 22 isolates, and the slide agglutination method was unable to type 16 isolates. The slide agglutination method compares favorably with the Pneumotest method and is easier to perform and to interpret.
机译:这项研究比较了针对肺炎球菌血清群的玻片凝集试验(日本东京Denka Seiken)和“金标准”抑制反应(Pneumotest; Statens Serum Institut,丹麦哥本哈根)。比较使用200株肺炎链球菌临床分离株。每种测定均根据制造商的说明进行。两种方法之间的总体一致性为95.7%。载玻片凝集测定仅检测到血清群22的10个分离株中的4个。通过载玻片凝集法将不能通过Pneumotest方法分型的两个分离株分为血清群6和31。 Pneumotest方法无法分型22个菌株,玻片凝集法无法分型16个菌株。载玻片凝集法与Pneumotest法相比具有优势,并且更易于执行和解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号