首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Chronic Respiratory Disease >Smoking status affects clinical characteristics and disease course of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A prospectively observational study
【2h】

Smoking status affects clinical characteristics and disease course of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A prospectively observational study

机译:吸烟状况影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的临床特征和疾病进程:一项前瞻性观察研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Existing studies primarily explored chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in smokers, whereas the clinical characteristics and the disease course of passive or nonsmokers have been rarely described. In the present study, patients hospitalized and diagnosed as acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) were recruited and followed up until being discharged. Clinical and laboratory indicators were ascertained and delved into. A total of 100 patients were covered, namely, 52 active smokers, 34 passive smokers, and 14 nonsmokers. As revealed from the results here, passive or nonsmokers developed less severe dyspnea (patients with modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC) <2, 0.0% vs. 8.8% vs. 14.3%, < 0.05, active, passive, and nonsmokers, respectively), higher oxygenation index (206.4 ± 45.5 vs. 241.2 ± 51.1 vs. 242.4 ± 41.8 mmHg, < 0.01), as well as lower arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (70.8 ± 12.7 vs. 58.85 ± 9.9 vs. 56.6 ± 6.5 mmHg, < 0.001). Despite lower treatment intensity over these patients, amelioration of dyspnea, mitigation of cough, and elevation of oxygenation index were comparable to those of active smokers. However, in terms of patients exhibiting mMRC ≥2 and type 2 respiratory failure, amelioration of dyspnea was more common in nonsmokers as compared with passive smokers (46.4% vs. 83.3%, < 0.05, passive and nonsmokers, respectively). In terms of patients exhibiting Global Initiative for COPD severity <3, mMRC ≥2, and type 2 respiratory failure, active smokers achieved the least mitigation of cough symptom (8.7% vs. 35.0% vs. 44.4%, < 0.05). Similar results could be achieved after the effects of confounders were excluded, with the most prominent amelioration of dyspnea (odds ratio (OR) 3.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–13.6, < 0.05, as compared with active smokers) and cough (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.0–10.7, < 0.05) in nonsmokers, and relatively better amelioration of hypoxemia in passive smokers (oxygenation index change, 39.0 ± 34.6 vs. 51.5 ± 32.4 vs. 45.3 ± 25.4 mmHg, < 0.05). In brief, passive or nonsmokers with AECOPD were subjected to less severe disease, and nonsmokers, especially patients with more severe disease, might achieve the optimal enhancement of clinical presentation after treatment.
机译:现有研究主要探讨吸烟者的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),而很少描述被动或不吸烟者的临床特征和疾病进程。在本研究中,招募了住院并诊断为COPD急性加重(AECOPD)的患者,并对其进行随访直至出院。确定和研究临床和实验室指标。总共覆盖了100位患者,即52位主动吸烟者,34位被动吸烟者和14位非吸烟者。从这里的结果中可以看出,被动吸烟者或不吸烟者发展为轻度呼吸困难(医学研究委员会量表(mMRC)调整后的患者分别为<2、0.0%,8.8%和14.3%,<0.05,主动,被动和不吸烟者),更高的氧合指数(206.4±45.5 vs.241.2±51.1 vs.242.4±41.8 mmHg,<0.01),以及较低的二氧化碳动脉分压(70.8±12.7 vs. 58.85±9.9 vs.56.6±6.5 mmHg ,<0.001)。尽管这些患者的治疗强度较低,但呼吸困难的改善,咳嗽的减轻和氧合指数的升高与吸烟者相当。然而,就表现出mMRC≥2和2型呼吸衰竭的患者而言,不吸烟者与被动吸烟者相比呼吸困难的缓解更为普遍(分别为46.4%和83.3%,<0.05,分别为被动吸烟者和非吸烟者)。对于表现出COPD严重性<3,mMRC≥2和2型呼吸衰竭的全球倡议的患者,积极吸烟者缓解咳嗽症状的可能性最小(8.7%比35.0%比44.4%,<0.05)。排除混杂因素的影响后,可以获得类似的结果,呼吸困难的最明显改善(优势比(OR)为3.8,95%置信区间(CI)为1.1–13.6,与活跃吸烟者相比<0.05)和咳嗽(OR 3.3,95%CI 1.0-10.7,<0.05)在非吸烟者中,被动吸烟者的低氧血症得到了较好的改善(氧化指数变化,39.0±34.6 vs. 51.5±32.4 vs. 45.3±25.4 mmHg,<0.05)。简而言之,AECOPD的被动或非吸烟者患病较轻,非吸烟者,尤其是病情较重的患者,可能在治疗后达到最佳的临床表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号